Volume 21 Issue 1
Jan.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHOU Zi-qian, LI Shu-yuan, NI Can. Comparison of clinical efficacy of implant-supported fixed denture and implant-supported overdenture in middle-aged and elderly edentulous patients 1-3 years after final restoration[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(1): 28-32. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002804
Citation: ZHOU Zi-qian, LI Shu-yuan, NI Can. Comparison of clinical efficacy of implant-supported fixed denture and implant-supported overdenture in middle-aged and elderly edentulous patients 1-3 years after final restoration[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(1): 28-32. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002804

Comparison of clinical efficacy of implant-supported fixed denture and implant-supported overdenture in middle-aged and elderly edentulous patients 1-3 years after final restoration

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002804
Funds:

 82001051

  • Received Date: 2022-07-08
    Available Online: 2023-04-07
  •   Objective  To compare the soft and hard tissues around implants, patient satisfaction and denture complications of middle-aged and elderly edentulous patients after completing the implant supported fixed denture (ISFP) or implant supported overdenture (IOD) for 1-3 years respectively.  Methods  This study selected 43 middle-aged to elderly complete or partial edentulous jaws patients (between 50 and 80 years old) who were admitted in Nanjing Stomatological Hospital from March 2019 to March 2021. They were divided into two groups according to the clinical method of prosthesis. One group received implant supported fixed prosthesis (ISFP group, 28 cases), another group was treated with implant supported overdenture (IOD group, 15 cases), and the patients were followed up for 1-3 years after final restoration. The soft and hard tissue changes after repair were evaluated and compared between the two groups.  Results  There was no significant difference in the soft and hard tissue changes around the implants between the ISFP and IOD groups after treatment for 1-3 years. The ISFP group patients had achieved better denture retention, masticatory function, voice function and patients ' satisfaction compared to the IOD group 1-3 years after the treatments, the ISFP group was (9.179±0.700) points, (8.464±0.793) points, (8.179±0.772) points, while IOD group was only (6.733±0.961) points, (6.467±0.915) points, (6.800±1.265) points, and the difference was statistically significant (all P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the evaluation of the aesthetics and comfort level of dentures between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of mechanical complications between the two groups. However, in terms of mechanical complications, the incidence of parts shedding or wear in IOD group was higher than that in ISFP group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant, while the incidence of biological complications between the two groups was not statistically significant.  Conclusion  The application of implant-supported fixed prosthesis and implant-supported overdenture fit for edentulous patients in some certain circumstances. Clinically, we should choose the appropriate method according to the patients ' previous treatment conditions and willingness. The result that implant-supported overdentures may have more long-term complications should also be considered.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    黄嘉筑, 林雪峰. 老年下颌牙列缺失患者种植覆盖义齿治疗的临床评估[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2019, 37(4): 428-432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXKQ201904021.htm

    HUANG J Z, LIN X F. Clinical evaluation of implant overdenture treatment for elderly patients with mandibular loss[J]. West China Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 37(4): 428-432. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HXKQ201904021.htm
    [2]
    DIKICIER S, ATAY A, KORKMAZ C. Health-related quality of life in edentulous patients[J]. J Med Life, 2021, 14(5): 683-689. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0277
    [3]
    BORGES G A, BARBIN T, DINI C, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures and clinical assessment of implant-supported overdentures and fixed prostheses in mandibular edentulous patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022, 127(4): 565-577. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.005
    [4]
    朱丽, 于德栋, 徐云侠. 高龄老年患者上颌窦内提升同期种植体植入手术的护理[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(6): 1046-1048, 1056. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001981

    ZHU L, YU D D, XU Y X. Nursing care of simultaneous implant placement in maxillary sinus in elderly patients[J]. Zhonghua General Medicine, 2021, 19(6): 1046-1048, 1056. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001981
    [5]
    宿玉成, 袁苏. 口腔种植学[M]. 2版. 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 19.

    SU Y C, YUAN S. Oral implantology[M]. 2nd Ed. People ' s Medical Publishing House, 2014: 19.
    [6]
    朱珠, 顾烨辰, 朱庆萍, 等. 老年患者种植修复成功率与满意度的随访研究[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 21-26.

    ZHU Z, GU Y C, ZHU Q P et al. A follow-up study on the success rate and satisfaction of implant restoration in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology Research (Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(1): 21-26.
    [7]
    ZHAO D, NING J, ZHAO Y F, et al. Associations of dietary and drinking water habits with number of natural teeth: a longitudinal study in the Chinese elderly population[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2021, 21(1): 525. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02473-7
    [8]
    成翔, 史妹军. 种植固定义齿修复与种植覆盖义齿修复对无牙颌患者的效果比较[J]. 饮食保健, 2021, 50(3): 52-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MRYX202008046.htm

    CHENG X, SHI M J. Comparison of the effect of implant fixed denture restoration and implant overdenture restoration on edentulous patients[J]. Diet Health, 2021, 50(3): 52-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MRYX202008046.htm
    [9]
    LEE D J, SAPONARO P C. Management of edentulous patients[J]. Dent Clin North Am, 2019, 63(2): 249-261. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.11.006
    [10]
    SANJEEVAN V, RAJAGOPAL P, VENKITACHALAM R, et al. Efficiency of simplified versus traditional denture fabrication methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 126(3): 377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.003
    [11]
    WANG J, ZHANG Z, DENG F. Marginal bone level change during sequential loading periods of partial edentulous rehabilitation using immediately loaded self-tapping implants: a 6.5-year retrospective study[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2022, 14(3): 133.
    [12]
    ROZOV R А. Immediate implant supported prosthodontic treatment of the edentulous jaw with additional implant stabilization[J]. Stomatologija, 2021, 23(3): 69-74.
    [13]
    路晓淼, 田瑞雪, 张凯. 牙支持式外科导板在前牙美学区种植的临床应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(3): 384-387. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002358

    LU X M, TIAN R X, ZHANG K. Clinical application of dental-supported surgical guide in implantation of anterior teeth aesthetic zone[J]. Zhonghua General Medicine, 2022, 20(3): 384-387. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002358
    [14]
    ABBASI M S, MARIAM Q. Remodeling pattern of residual alveolar ridge in adult edentulous population[J]. Ann Jinnah Sindh Med Univ, 2021, 7(1): 47.
    [15]
    庞鸿娟, 江鹭鹭, 赵宝红. 无牙颌骨种植覆盖义齿修复设计与并发症[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2020, 13(12): 715-720.

    PANG H J, JIANG L L, ZHAO B H. Design and complications of edentulous jaw implant overdenture restoration[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2020, 13(12): 715-720.
    [16]
    LEMOS C A A, NUNES R G, SANTIAGO- J U ' NIOR J F, et al. Are implant-supported removable partial dentures a suitable treatment for partially edentulous patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, S0022-3913(21)00334-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.017.
    [17]
    赵宝红, 庞鸿娟, 李雪菁, 等. 不同类型种植覆盖义齿临床疗效的回顾性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2021, 37(6): 549-553. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQYZ202106019.htm

    ZHAO B H, PANG H J, LI X J, et al. A retrospective study on the clinical efficacy of different types of implanted overdentures[J]. Stomatological Research, 2021, 37(6): 549-553. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQYZ202106019.htm
    [18]
    安维康, 刘利鹏, 张薇, 等. 不同种植位点下附着体类型对短种植体覆盖义齿的应力影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(2): 150-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQYZ202202012.htm

    AN W K, LIU L P, ZHANG W, et al. Stress effects of attachment types at different implant sites on short-implant overdentures[J]. Stomatological Research, 2022, 38(2): 150-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KQYZ202202012.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (206) PDF downloads(11) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return