Volume 21 Issue 10
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Fang, DAI Huimin, SHAO Jie, HU bing, MA Haiping, SHI Jianwei, HUANG Qian. Research on the method of measuring performance pay of family doctor teams based on hierarchical analysis and key performance indicator design[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(10): 1713-1718. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003208
Citation: ZHANG Fang, DAI Huimin, SHAO Jie, HU bing, MA Haiping, SHI Jianwei, HUANG Qian. Research on the method of measuring performance pay of family doctor teams based on hierarchical analysis and key performance indicator design[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(10): 1713-1718. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003208

Research on the method of measuring performance pay of family doctor teams based on hierarchical analysis and key performance indicator design

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003208
Funds:

 PWRd2021-08

 医疗卫生,PKJ2020-Y93

  • Received Date: 2023-01-17
    Available Online: 2023-11-23
  •   Objective  To construct a method of measuring performance pay of family doctor teams using analytic hierarchy process and key performance indicator based on the content and characteristics of the work of the family doctor team.  Methods  Firstly, in-depth interviews were conducted to understand the work content of the current family doctor team, and standardized work items for contracted services under the family doctor team were sorted out. The relative weights of the standardized work items were calculated using the hierarchical analysis method, the salary values of the standardized work items were calculated and quantitative indicators were constructed. Secondly, centralized meetings and discussions were used to set key performance indicators for family doctor signing services based on policy documents and practice base, and quality indicators were constructed. A performance compensation calculation method for family doctor teams was constructed using combining the two. Based on actual business data, the new and old plans were comparatively calculated and verified.  Results  There were 199 standardized work items for the number of services of family doctor team positions. The average relative standardized value was 6.47±3.32, with the highest relative standardized value for a single project being "home bed visits" and the lowest being "public welfare family planning consultation". The performance and quality indicator system for family doctor contract services included 3 dimensions, 5 first level indicators, and 6 second level indicators, and corresponding assessment methods were set. Based on the existing 3 748 pieces of general medical work data as the basic data, the total performance-based compensation was calculated to be 397 958 yuan according to the standardized value of the original plan. After optimization and adjustment, the calculation result was 405 315.4 yuan (excluding family doctor contract service fees), which was an overall increase of about 1.85% compared to the original plan. Perform DF test showed P < 0.05, which meted the requirements for data smoothness and could ensure the transition of new standardized work values and calculation schemes.  Conclusion  The method of measuring performance pay of family doctor teams based on analytic hierarchy process and key performance indicators can effectively connect old performance plans and promote the implementation of contract signing services.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    林吉祥, 顾静华, 汪天英, 等. 标化工作量在社区卫生服务机构全面绩效管理中的实践案例研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2021, 24(25): 3210-3220. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.183

    LIN J X, GU J H, WANG T Y, et al. Effect of Standardized Workload Used in Comprehensive Performance Management in Community Health Institutions: a Practice-based Analysis[J]. Chinese General Practice, 2021, 24(25): 3210-3220. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2021.00.183
    [2]
    张安, 黄萍. 基于标化工作量的上海市社区卫生财政补偿标准测算研究[J]. 中华医院管理杂志, 2019, 38(5): 674-677.

    ZHANG A, HUANG P. Standardization-based research on fiscal compensation measurement for communities in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration, 2019, 38(5): 674-677.
    [3]
    蒲柳伊, 代安. 新加坡家庭医生服务实施经验对我国的启示[J]. 医学与哲学(A), 2017, 38(10): 66-68, 73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXZX201710021.htm

    PU L Y, DAI A. Experience of Singapore Family Physician Service and Its Implication for Family Physician Service in China[J]. Medicine & Philosophy (A), 2017, 38(10): 66-68, 73. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXZX201710021.htm
    [4]
    范阳东, 江蕾, 柳薇, 等. 广州市家庭医生签约现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(1): 80-82, 166. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001736

    FAN Y D, JIANG L, LIU W, et al. Status of family doctor contract signing in Guangzhou and its influencing factors[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(1): 80-82, 166. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001736
    [5]
    陈红, 周蓉, 石建伟, 等. 我国家庭医生签约服务绩效考核的关键问题确认分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(11): 1813-1817. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002709

    CHEN H, ZHOU R, SHI J W, et al. Confirmation and analysis of critical issues in performance appraisal of family doctors'contracted services in China[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(11): 1813-1817. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002709
    [6]
    于勇, 郭良文, 喻明. 家庭医生签约服务绩效考核指标体系构建与实例考核分析: 以佛山市某社区卫生服务中心为例[J]. 中国农村卫生事业管理, 2023, 43(2): 100-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNWS202302006.htm

    YU Y, GUO L W, YU M. Construction of performance evaluation index system and analysis of practical cases of contracted service of family doctors: Taking a community health service center in Foshan City as an example[J]. Chinese Rural Health Service Administration, 2023, 43(2): 100-105. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNWS202302006.htm
    [7]
    张丹丹, 王彤, 金光辉, 等. 北京市郊区县家庭医生式服务开展现况: 全科医生专题小组访谈[J]. 中华全科医学, 2016, 14(9): 1425-1428. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2016.09.001

    ZHANG D D, WANG T, JIN G H, et al. Current status of family doctor service system undertaking in Beijing suburban areas: focus group interviews with general practitioners[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2016, 14(9): 1425-1428. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2016.09.001
    [8]
    王荣英, 张金佳, 贺振银, 等. 医务人员对家庭医生签约服务的认知情况调查[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(1): 94-96, 138. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000027

    WANG R Y, ZHANG J J, HE Z Y, et al. Investigation on medical staff' cognition of family doctor signing service[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(1): 94-96, 138. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000027
    [9]
    鲁南. 家庭医生绩效评价指标体系的标准化构建[J]. 大众标准化, 2022(17): 153-154, 157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZBH202217054.htm

    LU N. Standardization of performance evaluation index system for family doctors[J]. Popular Standardization, 2022(17): 153-154, 157. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZBH202217054.htm
    [10]
    耿静. D市家庭医生签约服务优化对策研究[D]. 镇江: 江苏大学, 2022.

    GENG J. Study on the optimization strategy of family doctor contracted service in city D[D]. Zhenjiang: Jiangsu University, 2022.
    [11]
    王玉珠. 家庭医生签约服务对老年人医疗费用的影响研究[D]. 北京: 北京协和医学院, 2022.

    WANG Y Z. Study on the impact of family doctor contract service on medical expenses of the elderly[D]. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College, 2022.
    [12]
    任瑞康. 西安市G区家庭医生签约服务评价指标体系构建与现状评估[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2021.

    REN R K. Construction of evaluation index system and status evaluation of family doctor contract service in G district of Xi 'an[D]. Xi 'an: Northwest University, 2021.
    [13]
    牛雨婷, 赵允伍, 王晓松, 等. 基于分级诊疗路径的慢性病防治体系建设探讨[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2022, 39(12): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSJJ202212003.htm

    NIU Y T, ZHAO Y W, WANG X S, et al. Discussion on the construction of the chronic disease prevention and treatment system based on the hierarchical medical system[J]. Health Economics Research, 2022, 39(12): 8-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSJJ202212003.htm
    [14]
    朱纯, 李冬华, 张幸娜, 等. 基于全科医生签约决策模型提升全科医生签约数量与质量的策略研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(3): 441-445. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002373

    ZHU C, LI D H, ZHANG X N, et al. Strategy research on improving the quantity and quality of general practitioner contract based on general practitioner contract decision model[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(3): 441-445. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002373
    [15]
    GHARIBI F, DADGAR E. Pay-for-performance challenges in family physician program[J]. Malays Fam Physician, 2020, 15(2): 19-29.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (71) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return