Volume 21 Issue 10
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JIN Jianguo, GAO Liyuan, WANG Xiangping, PAN Xiaoben. Preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer differentiation using DCE-MRI parameter histograms[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(10): 1728-1731. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003211
Citation: JIN Jianguo, GAO Liyuan, WANG Xiangping, PAN Xiaoben. Preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer differentiation using DCE-MRI parameter histograms[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(10): 1728-1731. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003211

Preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer differentiation using DCE-MRI parameter histograms

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003211
Funds:

 82070610

 B20220841

  • Received Date: 2023-06-05
    Available Online: 2023-11-23
  •   Objective  To analyze the diagnostic value of quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI histogram in preoperative evaluating the degree of differentiation of gastric cancer.  Methods  A total of 128 patients with gastric cancer admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine from May 2020 to May 2023 were selected as the study objects. DCE-MRI was performed before surgery to obtain the histogram of quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI, including the skewness, entropy, kurtosis, average value and 10%, 90% (P10, P90) of extravascular extracellular space volume ratio (Ve), volume transport constant (Ktrans) and rate constant (Kep). The value of the above parameters in evaluating the differentiation degree of gastric cancer was analyzed.  Results  The entropy, mean value, P10 and P90 of P10, Ktrans and Kep of Ve in low differentiation group were higher than those in middle differentiation group and high differentiation group (all P < 0.05). The skewness and kurtosis of Kep in low differentiation group were lower than those in middle differentiation group and high differentiation group (all P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that abnormal increases in Ktrans entropy, mean value, skewness, entropy, mean value, P10, P90 and Kep levels were risk factors affecting the differentiation degree of gastric cancer (all P < 0.05). ROC results showed that the AUC of Ktrans entropy, mean value, P10, P90 and Kep skewness, entropy, mean value, P10 and P90 in the diagnosis of poorly differentiated gastric cancer were 0.739, 0.806, 0.812, 0.758, 0.714, 0.726, 0.786, 0.761 and 0.749, respectively.  Conclusion  DCE-MRI quantitative parameter histogram has high diagnostic value in predicting the differentiation degree of gastric cancer, and Ktrans P10 has the best diagnostic efficacy.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    CHEN S, WEI Y, LIU H Y, et al. Analysis of Collagen type X alpha 1 (COL10A1) expression and prognostic significance in gastric cancer based on bioinformatics[J]. Bioengineered, 2021, 12(1): 127-137. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2020.1864912
    [2]
    黄一波, 牛英群, 黄国强, 等. 基于时钟基因启动子区甲基化的胃癌患者预后预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(1): 43-46. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002272

    HUANG Y B, NIU Y Q, HUNAG G Q, et al. Establishment and verification of a prognostic model for patients with gastric cancer based on clock gene promoter methylation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(1): 43-46. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002272
    [3]
    QIU H B, CAO S M, XU R H. Cancer incidence, mortality, and burden in China: a time-trend analysis and comparison with the United States and United Kingdom based on the global epidemiological data released in 2020[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2021, 41(10): 1037-1048. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12197
    [4]
    ZHANG M, HU S F, MIN M, et al. Dissecting transcriptional heterogeneity in primary gastric adenocarcinoma by single cell RNA sequencing[J]. Gut, 2021, 70(3): 464-475. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320368
    [5]
    黄一波, 王国平, 王奕, 等. 胃癌患者SFRP1、SFRP2、SDC-2甲基化与病理特征的相关性分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(12): 2008-2011. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002222

    HUANG Y B, WANG G P, WANG Y, et al. Correlation analysis of SFRP1, SFRP2 and SDC-2 methylation and pathological features in patients with gastric cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(12): 2008-2011. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002222
    [6]
    AMADO CABANA S, GALLEGO OJEA J C, FÉLEZ CARBALLADA M. Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in characterizing ovarian tumors classified as indeterminate at ultrasonography[J]. Radiologia (Engl Ed), 2022, 64(2): 110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2020.05.006
    [7]
    DAKHIL H A, EASA A M, HUSSEIN A Y, et al. Diagnostic role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating breast lesions[J]. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol, 2022, 29(2): e88-e94.
    [8]
    PARK H, KIM S H, KIM J Y. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for risk stratification in patients with prostate cancer[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2022, 12(1): 742-751. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-455
    [9]
    PIH G Y, GONG E J, CHOI J Y, et al. Associations of serum lipid level with gastric cancer risk, pathology, and prognosis[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2021, 53(2): 445-456. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.599
    [10]
    LU H M, WU Y Y, LIU X, et al. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting treatment response for cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2021, 13: 6065-6078. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S314289
    [11]
    OTA H, ITO M, KOBAYASHI C, et al. Superiority of sucrase-isomaltase to CD10 for immunohistochemical detection of intestinal absorptive cell phenotype in differentiated-type gastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2021, 14(10): 1031-1037.
    [12]
    SRIYOOK A, LERTBUTSAYANUKUL C, JITTAPIROMSAK N. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for determining the plasma Epstein-Barr virus status and staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Clin Imaging, 2021, 72: 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.047
    [13]
    LI Z H, ZHAO Z H, WANG C C, et al. Association between DCE-MRI perfusion histogram parameters and EGFR and VEGF expressions in different lauren classifications of advanced gastric cancer[J]. Pathol Oncol Res, 2022, 27: 1610001. DOI: 10.3389/pore.2021.1610001.
    [14]
    孙茜楠, 蒋璟璇, 胡晨瑞, 等. DCE-MRI参数直方图术前评估子宫内膜癌肿瘤分化程度的价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2020, 39(11): 2276-2281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCFS202011031.htm

    SUN X N, JIANG J X, HU C R, et al. Preoperative Evaluation of Differentiation of Endometrial Cancer by Histogram Analysis of DCE-MRI[J]. Journal of Clinical Radiology, 2020, 39(11): 2276-2281. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCFS202011031.htm
    [15]
    张霄, 张宏凯, 路双, 等. 动态对比增强MRI定量参数直方图分析预测胃癌病理分级的价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2022, 38(1): 64-67, 84.

    ZHANG X, ZHANG H K, LU S, et al. The value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative parameters using histogram analysis in predicting the pathological grades of gastric cancer[J]. Journal of Practical Radiology, 2022, 38(1): 64-67, 84.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (102) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return