Volume 22 Issue 2
Feb.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Chengliang, WANG Chunyan, HUANG Kai, HONG Xue, ZHANG Wei. The application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on diagnosis and treatment of cesarean section pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(2): 288-291. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003386
Citation: YANG Chengliang, WANG Chunyan, HUANG Kai, HONG Xue, ZHANG Wei. The application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on diagnosis and treatment of cesarean section pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(2): 288-291. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003386

The application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound on diagnosis and treatment of cesarean section pregnancy

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003386
Funds:

 2019KY698

  • Received Date: 2023-02-23
    Available Online: 2024-03-27
  •   Objective  To examine the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for diagnosing and treating cesarean section scar pregnancy (CSP) providing a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment of CSP.  Methods  The study retrospectively collected data from 80 suspected patients with CSP who were admitted to the Second Hospital of Jiaxing between January 2017 and January 2021. All patients underwent transvaginal ultrasonography and CEUS examination prior to surgery. The study compared the diagnostic efficacy of vaginal ultrasound and CEUS for CSP to surgical pathology, and observed the ultrasonographic manifestations; The parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound time-intensity curve (TIC) were compared between CSP and non-CSP patients, and the differences of CEUS related indexes in patients with different surgical methods were analyzed.  Results  Out of 80 patients suspected of having CSP, 60 cases (75.00%) were confirmed through operation and pathology. CEUS demonstrated significantly higher diagnostic sensitivity (96.67% vs. 86.67%) and accuracy (93.75% vs. 83.75%) compared to transvaginal ultrasound, which was considered the gold standard (P < 0.05). Out of 60 patients with CSP, 18 cases exhibited extravasation, 36 cases showed rich blood grading, and 46 cases showed gestational cystic lesions; The CEUS images revealed a "bagel" sign in 55 cases. The onset and peak times of angiography in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) were earlier than those in patients without CSVD (P < 0.05), Additionally, the peak intensity and rate of enhancement were greater in patients with CSVD (P < 0.05). The proportion of the major blood supply to the gestational sac/mass in the scar and the chorionic membrane/early placenta completely covering the scar was found to be higher in laparoscopic surgery than in ultrasound/hysteroscopy (P < 0.05), Additionally, the scar thickness was smaller in laparoscopic surgery (P < 0.05).  Conclusion  CEUS is typically characterized by the "bagel" sign in the diagnosis of CSP, which has greater diagnostic efficacy than transvaginal ultrasound, Additionally, the characteristics of the main blood supply site of CEUS pregnancy sac/mass may affect the treatment of CSP.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    HANÁČEK J, HEŘMAN H, KŘEPELKA P, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2022, 87(3): 193-197. doi: 10.48095/cccg2022193
    [2]
    王超, 姚颖, 李蓉, 等. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的流行病学研究: 现状与展望[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2021, 22(4): 444-445. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FKLC202104037.htm

    WANG C, YAO Y, LI R, et al. Epidemiologic study of cicatricial pregnancy in cesarean section: current situation and prospect[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019, 22(4): 444-445. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FKLC202104037.htm
    [3]
    TIMOR-TRITSCH I E. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a therapeutic dilemma[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(1): 32-33. doi: 10.1002/uog.23549
    [4]
    沈翠, 刘昕. 超声造影在剖宫产瘢痕妊娠诊断中的价值[J]. 中国数字医学, 2019, 14(2): 68-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YISZ201902027.htm

    SHEN C, LIU X. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. China Digital Medicine, 2019, 14(2): 68-70. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YISZ201902027.htm
    [5]
    LI H Y, LIU X X, XIE L J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and cut-off of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in caesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2020, 246: 117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.036
    [6]
    石辛景, 康志平, 刘亚静, 等. 经阴道超声和经腹部超声测量瘢痕妊娠的瘢痕厚度与实际厚度的相关性分析[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(1): 101-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GKGH202001015.htm

    SHI X J, KANG Z P, LIU Y J, et al. Correlation between the thickness of scar and the actual thickness of scar pregnancy measured by transvaginal ultrasound and transabdominal ultrasound[J]. Imaging Science and Photochemistry, 2020, 38(1): 101-108. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GKGH202001015.htm
    [7]
    吴建峰, 吴敏, 王春艳, 等. 剖宫产术后疤痕妊娠CT影像特征及其与超声对比分析[J]. 中国妇幼健康研究, 2021, 32(11): 1682-1686. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2021.11.025

    WU J F, WU M, WANG C Y, et al. Comparison and analysis of CT imaging characteristics and ultrasound of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research, 2021, 32(11): 1682-1686. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5293.2021.11.025
    [8]
    何雯, 郭芳, 黄丽蓉. 应用阴道超声、MRI检查在剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值分析[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2022, 20(7): 132-133, 153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR202207043.htm

    HE W, GUO F, HUANG L R. Diagnostic value of vaginal ultrasound and mri in scar pregnancy after cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of CT and MRI, 2022, 20(7): 132-133, 153. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CTMR202207043.htm
    [9]
    贾红靖, 梁宝权, 邓学东, 等. 经阴道超声及超声造影对瘢痕妊娠临床诊治价值的研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2022, 33(7): 515-518, 522. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYYX202207013.htm

    JIA H J, LIANG B Q, DENG X D, et al. Study on the clinical value of TVS and CEUS in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging, 2022, 33(7): 515-518, 522. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYYX202207013.htm
    [10]
    朱莉, 李丽雅, 吕国荣. 超声造影在瘢痕妊娠诊疗中的应用[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 35(9): 837-839. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2019.09.021

    ZHU L, LI L Y, LYU G R. The application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2019, 35(9): 837-839. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2019.09.021
    [11]
    刘冬梅, 刘勇, 顾小宁, 等. 超声造影评价子宫剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 35(11): 1019-1022. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCY201911017.htm

    LIU D M, LIU Y, GU X N, et al. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2019, 35(11): 1019-1022. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGCY201911017.htm
    [12]
    王静欣, 罗红, 杨太珠, 等. 超声造影在子宫瘢痕妊娠疑难病例中的应用价值[J]. 西部医学, 2020, 32(4): 555-558. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIBU202004023.htm

    WANG J X, LUO H, YANG T Z, et al. The diagnostic values of contrast enhanced ultrasound on difficult cases of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Medical Journal of West China, 2019, 32(4): 555-558. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XIBU202004023.htm
    [13]
    卓娜, 汪娟. 经阴道三维超声联合超声造影对瘢痕妊娠的诊断价值[J]. 临床与病理杂志, 2020, 40(9): 2302-2306. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WYSB202009013.htm

    ZHUO N, WANG J. Diagnostic value of three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Journal of Clinical and Pathological Research, 2020, 40(9): 2302-2306. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WYSB202009013.htm
    [14]
    JUNG E M, WEBER M A, WIESINGER I. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging of organs[J]. Radiologe, 2021, 61(Suppl 1): 19-28.
    [15]
    董黎淑, 沈翔. 垂体后叶素联合宫腔镜下负压清宫术治疗Ⅱ型剖宫产子宫瘢痕妊娠临床观察[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(4): 601-604. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001308

    DONG L S, SHEN X. Observation on the clinical efficacy of pituitrin combined with hysteroscopic negative pressure hysteroscopy in the treatment of type Ⅱ cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(4): 601-604. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001308
    [16]
    Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #49: cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 222(5): B2-B14.
    [17]
    熊光武. 剖宫产瘢痕妊娠治疗方法选择[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2021, 21(9): 769-775. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWWK202109001.htm

    XIONG G W. Selection of treatment methods for caesarean section scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2021, 21(9): 769-775. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWWK202109001.htm
    [18]
    ZHANG X L, PANG Y X, MA Y H, et al. A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(43): e22845. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022845.
    [19]
    肖汀, 黄伟俊, 张四友, 等. 经阴道超声与超声造影联合临床因素评估剖宫产术后瘢痕妊娠治疗方式的研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(3): 231-235.

    XIAO T, HUANG W J, ZHANG S Y, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with clinical factors to assess the treatment options of cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography, 2022, 31(3): 231-235.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (37) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return