Volume 22 Issue 6
Jun.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2024  >  22(6): 1022-1027
MA Li, WU Yue, DUAN Lian, BAO Mengyuan, WU Yongshun, XING Yan. Normal values of T1, T2, and ECV in 1.5T cardiovascular magnetic resonance scanning in health adults[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(6): 1022-1027. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003558
Citation: MA Li, WU Yue, DUAN Lian, BAO Mengyuan, WU Yongshun, XING Yan. Normal values of T1, T2, and ECV in 1.5T cardiovascular magnetic resonance scanning in health adults[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(6): 1022-1027. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003558
shu

Normal values of T1, T2, and ECV in 1.5T cardiovascular magnetic resonance scanning in health adults

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003558
  • 1.

    First Department of Comprehensive Internal Medicine, People' s Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830001, China

Funds:

 2021E02067

  • Received Date: 2024-02-28
    Available Online: 2024-07-22
    Abstract
  •   Objective  This study aims to describe normal adult myocardium, analyze the range of T1, T2, and ECV, and establish a quantitative technical reference value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters suitable for Xinjiang.  Methods  A total of 122 healthy adults who underwent CMR examination in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from March to September 2023 were collected and analyzed. The myocardial was performed using Cvi software, and the differences in cardiac function parameters, T1, T2, and ECV values among different genders, ages, and nationalities were analyzed.  Results  The average value of T1, T2, and ECV of the whole myocardium was (1 090±74) ms, (53.0±1.7) ms, and (28.3±3.3)%, respectively. The values of T1, T2, and ECV in females were higher than those in males: T1 [(1 121±78) ms vs. (1 065±61) ms, P < 0.05], T2 [(53.3±1.4) ms vs. (52.7±1.9) ms, P < 0.05], and ECV [(29.1±2.9)% vs. (27.7±3.5)%, P < 0.001]. The values of T1 and ECV increased with age, but there was no statistical difference. The T2 values of myocardium basal segment showed statistically significant differences between different age groups, and there was a correlation between T1 and T2 values and age in the whole population. The age correlation of T2 values was shown only in the male population, and the age correlation of T1 and ECV values was independent of gender. In the analysis of ethnic variability, ethnic minorities had significantly higher T1 values than Han Chinese, but the between-group differences in T2 and ECV values were not statistically significant.  Conclusion  In this study, the values of T1, T2, and ECV in the myocardium of health adult vary with age, gender, and ethnicity. It is necessary to correct the age, gender, and ethnicity when using quantitative techniques for CMR parameters to help clinicians diagnose cardiac disease more accurately and determine disease progress based on local reference values.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(24)
  • [1]
    ISMAIL T F, STRUGNELL W, COLETTI C, et al. Cardiac MR: from theory to practice[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 826283. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.826283.
    [2]
    洪雪冬, 郑穗生, 许玲, 等. 心脏磁共振对原发扩张性心肌病左心整体功能和心肌纤维化的应用研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(4): 633-636, 665. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000754

    HONG X D, ZHENG H S, XU L et al. Study of left ventricular global function and myocardial fibrosis in patients with primary dilated cardiomyopathy by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(4): 633-636, 665. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000754
    [3]
    NAKOU E, PATEL R K, FONTANA M, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping techniques: clinical applications and limitations[J]. Curr Cardiol Rep, 2021, 23(12): 185. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01607-y
    [4]
    HAN Y, CHEN Y, FERRARI V A. Contemporary application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Annu Rev Med, 2020, 71: 221-234. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-041818-015923
    [5]
    CAREDDA G, BASSAREO P P, CAU R, et al. Emerging role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing myocarditis: a blunder or the way to get the problem sorted?[J]. J Thorac Imaging, 2022, 37(2): W12-W27. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000634
    [6]
    FERREIRA V M, PIWCHNIK S K. CMR parametric mapping as a tool for myocardial tissue characterization[J]. Korean Circ J, 2020, 50(8): 658-676. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2020.0157
    [7]
    陈秀玉, 赵世华. 2017 SCMR心脏磁共振参数定量技术专家共识解读[J]. 磁共振成像, 2018, 9(5): 368-373. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGZC201805009.htm

    CHEN Y X, ZHAO S H. The interpretation of a consensus statement for parametric mapping techniques with cardiovascular magnetic resonance by SCMR in 2017[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2018, 9(5): 368-373. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGZC201805009.htm
    [8]
    GASTL M, SOKKLSKA J M, POLACIN M, et al. Parametric mapping CMR for the measurement of inflammatory reactions of the pericardium[J]. Open Heart, 2022, 9(1): e001919. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001919.
    [9]
    LEINER T, BOGAERT J, FRIEDRICH M G, et al. SCMR position paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2020, 22(1): 76. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00682-4
    [10]
    KALAPOS A, SZABO L, DOHY Z, et al. Automated T1 and T2 mapping segmentation on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2023, 10: 1147581. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1147581.
    [11]
    黄淑梅, 江桂华, 汪天悦, 等. 心脏磁共振细胞外容积在高血压性心脏病中的应用[J]. 磁共振成像, 2021, 12(3): 98-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGZC202103025.htm

    HUANG S M, JIANG G H, WANG T Y, et al. Application of cardiac magnetic resonance extracellular volume in hypertensive heart disease[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(3): 98-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGZC202103025.htm
    [12]
    JANG J, NGO L H, CAPTUR G, et al. Measurement reproducibility of slice-interleaved T1 and T2 mapping sequences over 20 months: a single center study[J]. PLoS One, 2019, 14(7): e220190. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220190.
    [13]
    GRANITZ M, MOTLOCH L J, GRANITZ C, et al. Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers: reference values and clinical implications[J]. Wien Klin Wochenschr, 2019, 131(7-8): 143-155. doi: 10.1007/s00508-018-1411-3
    [14]
    DENG W, XUE Y, LI Y, et al. Normal values of aagnetic resonance T(1rho) relaxation times in the adult heart at 1.5T MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2023, 58(2): 477-485. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28506
    [15]
    GROSCHEL J, TRAUZEDDEL R F, MULLER M, et al. Multi-site comparison of parametric T1 and T2 mapping: healthy travelling volunteers in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR)[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2023, 25(1): 47. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00954-9
    [16]
    HENNINGSSON M. Cartesian dictionary-based native T(1) and T(2) mapping of the myocardium[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2022, 87(5): 2347-2362. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29143
    [17]
    BAESSLER B, SCHAARSCHMIDT F, STEHNING C, et al. A systematic evaluation of three different cardiac T2-mapping sequences at 1.5 and 3T in healthy volunteers[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2015, 84(11): 2161-2170. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.08.002
    [18]
    HUANG Q, MENDES J, ADLURU G, et al. Technical note: accuracy and precision of T2 and T2* with a gradient-echo spin-echo (GESE) sequence for cardiac imaging[J]. Med Phys, 2023, 50(12): 7946-7954. doi: 10.1002/mp.16569
    [19]
    NAKAMORI S, DOHI K. Myocardial tissue imaging with cardiovascular magnetic resonance[J]. J Cardiol, 2022, 80(5): 377-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.006
    [20]
    MELONI A, NICOLA M, POSITANO V, et al. Myocardial T2 values at 1.5T by a segmental approach with healthy aging and gender[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(5): 2962-2975. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08396-6
    [21]
    ALSAIED T, TSENG S Y, SIDDIQUI S, et al. Pediatric myocardial T1 and T2 value associations with age and heart rate at 1.5T[J]. Pediatr Cardiol, 2021, 42(2): 269-277. doi: 10.1007/s00246-020-02479-9
    [22]
    XU Z, LI W, WANG J, et al. Reference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in healthy Chinese adults: a multicenter 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study[J]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson, 2023, 25(1): 64. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00974-5
    [23]
    YAMAGATA K, YAMAGATA L M, ABELA M, et al. Native T1 and T2 reference values for maltese healthy cohort[J]. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging, 2023, 39(1): 153-159.
    [24]
    JARKMAN C, CARLHALL C J, HENNINGSSON M. Clinical evaluation of the multimapping technique for simultaneous myocardial T(1) and T(2) mapping[J]. Front Cardiovasc Med, 2022, 9: 960403. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.960403.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(5)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (34) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return