Volume 22 Issue 7
Jul.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Lu, LI Xianhai, LIU Xiancui, XU Hao, ZHANG Liang. Effect of 3D printed titanium interbody fusion device combined with PRP-containing allograft bone in ACDF surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(7): 1133-1137. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003583
Citation: WANG Lu, LI Xianhai, LIU Xiancui, XU Hao, ZHANG Liang. Effect of 3D printed titanium interbody fusion device combined with PRP-containing allograft bone in ACDF surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(7): 1133-1137. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003583

Effect of 3D printed titanium interbody fusion device combined with PRP-containing allograft bone in ACDF surgery

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003583
Funds:

 2020ZB163

 2023C31009

  • Received Date: 2023-11-23
    Available Online: 2024-09-05
  •   Objective  This study analyzes the clinical outcomes of the combined application of 3D-printed titanium alloy intervertebral fusion devices and autologous bone treated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. It further assesses the potential benefits of this combination in promoting spinal stability and vertebral fusion.  Methods  From August 2021 to May 2023, 110 patients with cervical spondylosis who needed ACDF were selected. Among them, 56 patients with 3D printed interbody fusion cage were classified as Group A, and 54 patients with 3D printed interbody fusion cage combined with PRP allograft were classified as Group B. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and visual simulated pain (VAS) score were observed, and the segmental angle (SA), cervical curvature index (CCI), intervertebral disc height (IH) and the fusion rate at each time point after operation were measured.  Results  There was no significant difference in operation time and blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05), and the postoperative drainage in group B was significantly less than that in group A (P < 0.05). There were statistical differences in VAS score and JOA score evaluated at different times (P < 0.05). There were statistical differences in SA, CCI, and IH measured at different times (P < 0.05). The X-ray of the cervical spine showed that the imaging fusion rates of group A and group B were 48.21% (27/56) and 70.37% (38/54) at 3 months after operation, 73.21% (41/56) and 92.59% (50/54) at 6 months after operation, and 100.00% at 12 months after operation. The fusion rates of group B at 3 months and 6 months after operation were significantly higher than those of group A (P < 0.05).  Conclusion  The use of a 3D printed interbody fusion cage combined with PRP-containing allogenic bone in ACDF has the advantage of less postoperative drainage, which can also promote early fusion and improve the success rate of fusion surgery.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    吴昊, 于海洋, 翟云雷, 等. 椎间隙环Cage周围270°自体骨回植术对腰椎融合术后椎体融合率及疗效的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(9): 1488-1491. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002093

    WU H, YU H Y, ZHAI Y L, et al. Effect of 270åutogenous bone replantation around the intervertebral cage on vertebral fusion rate and efficacy after lumbar fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1488-1491. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002093
    [2]
    ZHANG Y, DU S, AIYITI W, et al. Customized design and biomechanical property analysis of 3D-printed tantalum intervertebral cages[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2024, 35(2): 99-124.
    [3]
    POWERS A Y, NIN D Z, CHEN Y W, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with structural allograft is associated with lower postoperative health care utilization and reoperations compared with cage implants[J]. Oper Neurosurg(Hagerstown), 2024, 26(1): 16-21.
    [4]
    万鑫, 徐春磊, 石巍, 等. 肌源性微粒及lactadherin蛋白与髋关节周围骨折患者高凝状态的相关研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2022, 42(13): 839-846. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20220119-00033

    WAN X, XU C L, SHI W, et al. Correlation of muscle-derived microparticles and lactadherin proteins with hypercoagulability in patients with perihip fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics, 2022, 42(13): 839-846. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20220119-00033
    [5]
    MCCARTHY M H, WEINER J A, PATEL A A. Strategies to achieve spinal fusion in multilevel anterior cervical spine surgery: an overview[J]. HSS J, 2020, 16(2): 155-161. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09738-3
    [6]
    MENG M, WANG J, HUANG H, et al. 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: methods, applications and future prospects[J]. J Orthop Translat, 2023, 42: 94-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2023.08.004
    [7]
    LIU L W, WANG C S. The clinical effect of warm acupuncture and moxibustion combined with nerve mobilization in the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy, cervical mobility and its impact on VAS score[J]. PLA Med J, 2021, 33(2): 97-100.
    [8]
    AL SAIEGH F, PHILIPP L, HUGHES L P, et al. The impact of incorporating evidence-based guidelines for lumbar fusion surgery in neurosurgical resident education[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 154: e382-e388. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.045
    [9]
    Basic Research and Chemotherapy Group of the Spinal Cord Professional Committee of the Chinese Rehabilitation Medical Association. Basic Research and Chemotherapy Group of the Spinal Cord Professional Committee of the Chinese Rehabilitation Medical Association expert consensus on the application of bioactive materials in spinal fusion surgery[J]. Chinese Med J, 2022, 102(7): 479-485.
    [10]
    郝定均, 杨俊松, 刘团江, 等. 从仿生学角度论下颈椎骨折脱位的治疗[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2022, 24(7): 553-557. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20220606-00306

    HAO D J, YANG J S, LIU T J, et al. On the treatment of subaxial cervical fracture and dislocation from the perspective of bionics[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2022, 24(7): 553-557. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115530-20220606-00306
    [11]
    LI S, HUAN Y, ZHU B, et al. Research progress on the biological modifications of implant materials in 3D printed intervertebral fusion cages[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2021, 33(1): 2.
    [12]
    ZHANG T, DUNSON J, KANWAL F, et al. Trends in outcomes for marginal allografts in liver transplant[J]. JAMA Surg, 2020, 155(10): 926-932. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2484
    [13]
    LECKENBY J I, FURRER C, HAUG L, et al. A retrospective case series reporting the outcomes of avance nerve allografts in the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2020, 145(2): 368-381. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006485
    [14]
    EVERTS P, ONISHI K, JAYARAM P, et al. Platelet-rich plasma: new performance understandings and therapeutic considerations in 2020[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(20): 7794-7796. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207794
    [15]
    XU J, GOU L, ZHANG P, et al. Platelet-rich plasma and regenerative dentistry[J]. Aust Dent J, 2020, 65(2): 131-142. doi: 10.1111/adj.12754
    [16]
    KO T T, WU C L, CHANG H K, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty for magnetic resonance-evident cervical spondylotic myelopathy: comparison with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2023, 55(3): E3. DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.FOCUS23291.
    [17]
    RAAD M, XU A L, ORTIZ-BABILONIA C, et al. A five-year cost-utility analysis comparing synthetic cage versus allograft use in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Spine, 2023, 48(5): 330-334.
    [18]
    WU S, QUAN K, MEI J, et al. Cortical allograft strut augmented with platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of long bone non-union in lower limb- a pilot study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1): 512. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05375-w
    [19]
    WU J, FENG Q, YANG D, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of different sizes of 3D printed cage in lumbar interbody fusion-a finite element analysis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2023, 24(1): 85. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06201-7.
    [20]
    ZHANG Y T, DU S, AIYITI W, et al. Customized design and biomechanical property analysis of 3D-printed tantalum intervertebral cages[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2024, 35(2): 99-124.
    [21]
    BURNARD J L, PARR W C H, CHOY W J, et al. 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices[J]. Eur Spine J, 2020, 29(6): 1248-1260. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06236-2
    [22]
    MANICKAM P S, ROY S, SHETTY G M. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel S-type, dynamic zero-profile cage design for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with variations in bone graft shape: a finite element analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2021, 154: e199-e214. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.07.013
    [23]
    VAN HORN M R, BEARD R, WANG W, et al. Comparison of 3D-printed titanium-alloy, standard titanium-alloy, and PEEK interbody spacers in an ovine model[J]. Spine J, 2021, 21(12): 2097-2103.
    [24]
    BURNARD J L, PARR W C H, CHOY W J, et al. 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices[J]. Eur Spine J, 2020, 29(6): 1248-1260.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (50) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return