Volume 22 Issue 7
Jul.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SANG Xu, WANG Zhaodong, ZHANG Chao, RUI Yan, CHEN Xin. The application impact of integrated problem driven teaching method in clinical thinking of medical undergraduate students[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(7): 1230-1233. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003606
Citation: SANG Xu, WANG Zhaodong, ZHANG Chao, RUI Yan, CHEN Xin. The application impact of integrated problem driven teaching method in clinical thinking of medical undergraduate students[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(7): 1230-1233. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003606

The application impact of integrated problem driven teaching method in clinical thinking of medical undergraduate students

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003606
Funds:

 2020jyxm1194

  • Received Date: 2024-03-07
    Available Online: 2024-09-05
  •   Objective  Exploring the impact of integrated problem-driven teaching method on clinical thinking of medical undergraduate students before clinical internship, and providing theoretical basis for clinical teaching methods.  Methods  A total of 267 undergraduate students majoring in clinical medicine from Bengbu Medical University in 2020 were selected as the research subjects. The study subjects were divided into a PBL group and a control group using an equidistant random sampling method, with 127 cases in the PBL group and 140 cases in the control group. The control group only participated in traditional lecture-based teaching plans, while the PBL group added PBL courses on top of the control group. The classroom performance and clinical thinking ability of the two groups were explored, and the relevant factors that affect clinical thinking ability were analyzed.  Results  During the pre-test, there was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of classroom performance between the PBL group and the control group (P>0.05); During the post-test, there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of classroom performance between the PBL group and the control group (P < 0.05). During the pre-test, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores of critical thinking ability, systematic thinking ability, evidence-based thinking ability, and total score between the two groups (P>0.05). During the post-test, the total score of clinical thinking ability in the PBL group was higher than that in the control group (73.71±12.65 vs. 66.90±11.01, P < 0.05), and the scores of all dimensions were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that the higher the frequency of reading medical literature (B=6.811, P < 0.001) and the higher the ranking of PBL scores (B=4.014, P=0.010), the stronger the clinical thinking ability.  Conclusion  The integrated problem-driven teaching method has a positive impact on improving the clinical thinking ability of medical students, with the main influencing factors being the frequency of literature reading and PBL course ranking.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ARIF T B, MUNAF U, UL-HAQUE I. The future of medical education and research: is chatGPT a blessing or blight in disguise?[J]. Med Educ Online, 2023, 28(1): 2181052. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2181052.
    [2]
    JUAREZ P D, RAMESH A, REUBEN J S, et al. Transforming medical education to provide gender-affirming care for transgender and gender-diverse patients: a policy brief[J]. Ann Fam Med, 2023, 21(Suppl 2): S92-S94. doi: 10.1370/afm.2926
    [3]
    SULLIVAN G M, SIMPSON D, ARTINO A J, et al. Graduate medical education ' s role in the battle for evidence-based care[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2023, 15(3): 279-282. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00313.1
    [4]
    BEVAN J, BLYTH R, RUSSELL B, et al. Planetary health and sustainability teaching in UK medical education: a review of medical school curricula[J]. Med Teach, 2023, 45(6): 623-632. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2152190
    [5]
    SONG S L, YU Z Z, PAVLECH L, et al. Theoretical frameworks in medical education: using a systematic review of ophthalmology education research to create a theory of change model[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2022, 14(5): 568-582. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00115.1
    [6]
    CHAN V, BAIG S. Level up: gamifying medical education for enhanced learning experiences[J]. Am J Med Sci, 2023, 366(4): 243-244. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2023.06.007
    [7]
    YOU Y, WANG W M, CLELAND J. Does medical education reform change who is selected? A national cross-sectional survey from China[J]. BMJ Open, 2023, 13(8): e70239. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070239.
    [8]
    KIM Y R, YOO S M, PARK H J. Medical education program implementation experience in an elective course: a case study in South Korea[J]. Korean J Med Educ, 2023, 35(2): 199-205. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2023.260
    [9]
    STEPAN J G, MAJAHAN A, DANN A, et al. Accreditation council for graduate medical education hand surgery milestones V2.0 development and implementation: what fellowship directors, faculty, and fellows need to know[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2023, 48(10): 1045-1050.
    [10]
    PRICE N, JOWSEY T, WELLER J. Reflecting on insight and insights into reflection: a systematic review of insight and reflection in post graduate medical education[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2023, 93(11): 2589-2599. doi: 10.1111/ans.18693
    [11]
    SULLIVAN G M, SIMPSON D, ARTINO A J, et al. Did you catch these non-JGME medical education articles from 2022? Editors ' recommendations[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2023, 15(1): 1-5. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00959.1
    [12]
    EWNTE B, YIGZAW T. Early clinical exposure in medical education: the experience from Debre Tabor University[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2023, 23(1): 252. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04221-4.
    [13]
    VAPIWALA N, STEINBERG M, GROSS C. The accreditation council for graduate medical education ' s recent changes to radiation oncology training program standards: raising the bar for postgraduate training quality to better reflect our specialty and better serve our patients[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2023, 115(2): 285-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.033
    [14]
    CHAMBERS J, MISTRY K, SPINK J, et al. Online medical education using a facebook peer-to-peer learning platform during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study exploring learner and tutor acceptability of Facebook as a learning platform[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2023, 23(1): 293. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04268-3.
    [15]
    STARMER D L, RUSSELL K, JULIFF D. A cancer education framework for Australian medical schools: an announcement of a new educational program[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2023, 38(2): 677-681. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02173-9
    [16]
    KOCH L K, CHANG O H, DINTZIS S M. Medical education in pathology: general concepts and strategies for implementation[J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2021, 145(9): 1081-1088.
    [17]
    YONG C, BROWN J A, TAKACS E B. Performing medical education research in urology: challenges and opportunities[J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2020, 21(11): 45. DOI: 10.1007/s11934-020-00997-w.
    [18]
    PHILIBERT I, BLOUIN D. Responsiveness to societal needs in postgraduate medical education: the role of accreditation[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2020, 20(Suppl 1): 309. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02125-1.
    [19]
    BOONMAK P, SURASERANIVONGSE S, PATTARAVIT N, et al. Simulation-based medical education in Thailand: a cross-sectional online national survey[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2022, 22(1): 298. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03369-9.
    [20]
    JENKINS T M, UNDERMAN K, VINSON A H, et al. The resurgence of medical education in sociology: a return to our roots and an agenda for the future[J]. J Health Soc Behav, 2021, 62(3): 255-270.
    [21]
    瞿色华, 张阵, 武玉猛, 等. 情景模拟PBL教学法在儿科实习生岗位胜任能力中的应用价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2023, 21(2): 316-319. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202302034.htm

    QU S H, ZHANG Z, WU Y M, et al. The Application Value of Scenario Simulation PBL Teaching Method in Improving the Competence of Pediatric Interns[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2023, 21(2): 316-319. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202302034.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (13) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return