Volume 22 Issue 8
Aug.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yuntao, WANG Senhu, WANG Yujie, LI Zixuan, QI Shuyuan, WANG Guozhong, WANG Yuping, ZHANG Libin, WANG Haotian, GUO Jincheng. Learning curve of the distal radial access for coronary intervention[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(8): 1321-1324. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003626
Citation: WANG Yuntao, WANG Senhu, WANG Yujie, LI Zixuan, QI Shuyuan, WANG Guozhong, WANG Yuping, ZHANG Libin, WANG Haotian, GUO Jincheng. Learning curve of the distal radial access for coronary intervention[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(8): 1321-1324. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003626

Learning curve of the distal radial access for coronary intervention

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003626
Funds:

 首发2022-2-7086

 LHYY2021-LC02

  • Received Date: 2024-02-11
    Available Online: 2024-11-19
  •   Objective  To determine the correlation between operator experience in distal transradial coronary intervention (dTRI) and the successful cannulation rate of the distal radial artery (DRA), as well as to identify risk factors for puncture and cannulation failures.  Methods  From January 2021 to December 2022, 1 000 patients who underwent dTRI via DRA by a single interventionist in Beijing Luhe Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. These patients were chronologically ranked and divided into ten groups (100 cases each) according to operation time and order. The primary endpoint was the successful cannulation rate of DRA for every 100 cases, while the secondary endpoints were the success rate of one-time puncture catheterization and puncture catheterization time. Logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify predictors of unsuccessful DRA.  Results  A total of 1 000 patients were enrolled, with a successful DRA cannulation rate of 92.3%. After 200 cases, this rate stabilized at 93.0% (P=0.075). The first attempt DRA puncture success rate improved from 74.0% to 96.0%, while the median sheath cannulation time decreased from 3.00 min to 2.00 min (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that a negative association between DRA diameter (P=0.020) and cannulation failure, and a positive association with left artery access (P=0.046).  Conclusion  Achieving over 93.0% success in DRA puncture and cannulation becomes consistent after 200 cases. Small DRA diameter and left-sided access are key predictors of failure.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    NEUMANN F J, SOUSA-UVA M, AHLSSON A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur Heart J, 2019, 40(2): 87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394
    [2]
    中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死诊断和治疗指南(2019)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2019, 47(10): 766-783.

    Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association, Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. 2019 Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2019, 47(10): 766-783.
    [3]
    吴士礼, 唐碧, 刘进军, 等. 经桡动脉急诊PCI与溶栓后早期PCI对ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者心功能的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(11): 1829-1832. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001067

    WU S L, TANG B, LIU J J, et al. Observation of effect of transradial emergency PCI and early PCI after thrombolysis on cardiac function in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(11): 1829-1832. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001067
    [4]
    BERNAT I, AMINIAN A, PANCHOLY S, et al. Best practices for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial diagnostic angiography and intervention: an international consensus paper[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2019, 12(22): 2235-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.07.043
    [5]
    TSIGKAS G, PAPAGEORGIOU A, MOULIAS A, et al. Distal or traditional transradial access site for coronary procedures: a single-center, randomized study[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 15(1): 22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.037
    [6]
    LEE J W, PARK S W, SON J W, et al. Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective observational study (ledra)[J]. EuroIntervention, 2018, 14(9): e995-e1003. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00635
    [7]
    FEGHALY J, CHEN K, BLANCO A, et al. Distal versus conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2023, 101(4): 722-736. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30602
    [8]
    SGUEGLIA G A, DI GIORGIO A, GASPARDONE A, et al. Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2018, 11(20): 2113-2119. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.04.045
    [9]
    VERGARA-GARCIA D, GOMEZ-PAZ S, ROBINSON T M, et al. Transition to radial approach for neurovascular procedures is safe and convenient: characterization of a learning experience[J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2020, 19(5): 489-494. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa133
    [10]
    BERTRAND O F. Acute forearm muscle swelling post transradial catheterization and compartment syndrome: prevention is better than treatment![J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 75(3): 366-368. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22448
    [11]
    王欢欢, 刘丹, 郭继东, 等. 经鼻烟壶区远端桡动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的效果和安全性分析[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2021, 36(12): 1168-1172.

    WANG H H, LIU D, GUO J D, et al. Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2021, 36(12): 1168-1172.
    [12]
    LEE J W, SON J W, GO T H, et al. Reference diameter and characteristics of the distal radial artery based on ultrasonographic assessment[J]. Korean J Intern Med, 2022, 37(1): 109-118. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.685
    [13]
    ROH J W, KIM Y, LEE O H, et al. The learning curve of the distal radial access for coronary intervention[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 13217. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92742-7.
    [14]
    BOMPOTIS G C, GIANNOPOULOS G, KARAKANAS A I, et al. Left distal radial artery access for coronary angiography and interventions: a 12-month all-comers study[J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2022, 34(7): E505-E509.
    [15]
    MORI S, HIRANO K, YAMAWAKI M, et al. A comparative analysis between ultrasound-guided and conventional distal transradial access for coronary angiography and intervention[J]. J Interv Cardiol, 2020, 2020: 7342732. DOI: 10.1155/2020/7342732.
    [16]
    陈超, 朱壹明, 孙俊龙, 等. 影响远端桡动脉穿刺成功率相关因素分析[J]. 浙江中医药大学学报, 2021, 45(1): 28-33.

    CHEN C, ZHU Y M, SUN J L, et al. Analysis of the factors influencing the success rate of distal radial artery puncture[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 2021, 45(1): 28-33.
    [17]
    KIM Y, AHN Y, KIM I, et al. Feasibility of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via left snuffbox approach[J]. Korean Circ J, 2018, 48(12): 1120-1130. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0181
    [18]
    SOYDAN E, AKIN M. Left distal radial artery access site in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: is it safe?[J]. Balkan Med J, 2020, 37(5): 276-280.
    [19]
    FERRANTE G, CONDELLO F, RAO S V, et al. Distal vs conventional radial access for coronary angiography and/or intervention: a meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2022, 15(22): 2297-2311.
    [20]
    YOSHIMACHI F, IKARI Y. Distal radial approach: a review on achieving a high success rate[J]. Cardiovasc Interv Ther, 2021, 36(1): 30-38.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return