Volume 22 Issue 9
Sep.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
PAN Xiaoqin, SHEN Liwen, ZHU Mengyi. Effect of fresh embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients with GnRH antagonist[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(9): 1542-1545. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003678
Citation: PAN Xiaoqin, SHEN Liwen, ZHU Mengyi. Effect of fresh embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients with GnRH antagonist[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(9): 1542-1545. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003678

Effect of fresh embryo transfer on clinical pregnancy outcomes in patients with GnRH antagonist

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003678
Funds:

 2022KY368

  • Received Date: 2024-04-28
  •   Objective  To compare of clinical outcomes between fresh cycle transfer and first frozen embryo transfer (FET) in patients during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) with GnRH antagonist protocol, to explore embryo transfer strategies for GnRH antagonist protocol.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was performed for patients using GnRH antagonist protocol at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Huzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, from 2017 to 2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether fresh embryos were transferred. Patients in the study group were treated with fresh embryo transfer (n=197), while patients in the control group were those whose whole embryos freezing and completed the first FET (n=136). The differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups were compared.  Results  There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate (CPR, 50.8% vs. 54.4%, P=0.512), and live birth rate (LBR, 41.1% vs. 46.3%, P=0.346)between the fresh embryo transfer group and the frozen embryo transfer group in patients using GnRH antagonist protocol through univariate analysis, and also in the implantation rate of cleavage embryo and blastocyst (P > 0.05). The age of patients undergoing COH with GnRH antagonist protocol was the only factor predicted both CPR (RR=0.989, 95% CI: 0.981-0.997, P=0.007) and LBR (RR=0.992, 95% CI: 0.983-0.999, P=0.048) through modified Poisson regression. The fresh embryo transfer was not a factor influencing CPR (RR=1.016, 95% CI: 0.924-1.118, P=0.742) and LPR (RR=1.020, 95% CI: 0.922-1.128, P=0.700).  Conclusion  The age of patients is the only significant predictor of both CPR and LBR using COH with GnRH antagonist protocol, whereas fresh embryo transplantation doses not affect clinical pregnancy outcome.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    罗桂英, 王婕妤, 王春艳, 等. 体外受精-胚胎移植患者取卵术后疼痛的影响因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(8): 1269-1272. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002037

    LUO G Y, WANG J Y, WANG C Y, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of pain in patients after oocyte retrieval of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(8): 1269-1272. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002037
    [2]
    COBO A, GARCIA-VELASCO J, DOMINGO J, et al. Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(12): 2222-2231. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey321
    [3]
    LAMBALK C B, BANGA F R, HUIRNE J A, et al. GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2017, 23(5): 560-579. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx017
    [4]
    ZHU S, LV Z, SONG L, et al. Estradiol pretreatment in GnRH antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI treatment[J]. Open Med (Wars), 2022, 17(1): 1811-1820. doi: 10.1515/med-2022-0594
    [5]
    ATTALI E, YOGEV Y. The impact of advanced maternal age on pregnancy outcome[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2021, 70: 2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.006
    [6]
    PACCHIAROTTI A, IACONIANNI P, CAPORALI S, et al. Severe endometriosis: low value of AMH did not affect oocyte quality and pregnancy outcome in IVF patients[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2020, 24(22): 11488-11495.
    [7]
    GENG Y D, XUN Y, HU S Q, et al. GnRH antagonist versus follicular-phasesingle-dose GnRH agonist protocol in patients of normal ovarian responses during controlled ovarian stimulation[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2019, 35(4): 309-313. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1528221
    [8]
    XU B F, ZHOU M J, WANG J W, et al. Increased AIF-1-mediated TNF-alpha expression during implantation phase in IVF cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018, 33(7): 1270-1280. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey119
    [9]
    姜薇, 倪丹玉, 李欣, 等. 促性腺激素释放激素长方案和拮抗剂方案促排卵冻融胚胎移植周期结局的比较[J]. 国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志, 2022, 41(2): 101-105.

    JIANG W, NI D Y, LI X, et al. Comparison of Outcomes of Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer after GnRH-Agonist Long Protocol and GnRH-Antagonist Protocol[J]. Journal of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning, 2022, 41(2): 101-105.
    [10]
    SHA T T, YIN X Q, CHENG W W, et al. Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis[J]. Fertil Steril, 2018, 109(2): 330-342. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.10.019
    [11]
    董则含, 吴琰婷, 刘含, 等. 冰冻胚胎移植子代幼儿的体格和神经认知发育评估[J]. 上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2020, 40(6): 719-726. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2020.06.004

    DONG Z H, WU Y T, LIU H, et al. Evaluation of physical and neurocognitive development of infants conceived from frozen embryo transfer[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University: Medical Science, 2020, 40(6): 719-726. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-8115.2020.06.004
    [12]
    李宣, 刘嘉茵, 陈文森, 等. 比较长方案与拮抗剂方案在正常反应人群中的应用[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2018, 38(3): 219-223.

    LI X, LIU J Y, CHEN W S, et al. Comparison of the agonist protocol and antagonist protocol in normal responders[J]. Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 2018, 38(3): 219-223.
    [13]
    赵善可, 傅瑶, 褚大鹏, 等. 促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案比激动剂长方案获得更多可利用胚胎[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2022, 42(3): 479-483.

    ZHAO S K, FU Y, CHU D P, et al. Gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol brings about more available embryos than agonist long protocol[J]. Basic and Clinical Medicine, 2022, 42(3): 479-483.
    [14]
    ZHU J R, XING W J, LI T, et al. GnRH antagonist protocol versus GnRH agonist long protocol: a retrospective cohort study on clinical outcomes and maternal-neonatal safety[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2022, 13: 875779. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.875779.
    [15]
    何丽冰, 陈福锐, 陈诗琪, 等. 比较卵巢储备功能正常患者拮抗剂方案超促排卵中hCG扳机与双扳机的应用效果[J]. 中华生殖与避孕杂志, 2023, 43(10): 1046-1050.

    HE L B, CHEN F R, CHEN S Q, et al. Comparison of the application effects between hCG trigger and dual trigger in patients with normal ovarian reserve undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with antagonist protocol[J]. Chinese Journal of Reproduction and Contraception, 2023, 43(10): 1046-1050.
    [16]
    包莉莉, 吴小华, 刘荣娜, 等. 拮抗剂方案中延长HCG暴露时间对PCOS患者妊娠结局的影响[J]. 现代妇产科进展, 2022, 31(7): 504-507.

    BAO L L, WU X H, LIU R N, et al. The effect of prolonged HCG exposure time during GnRH agonist protocol on the clinical outcome of PCOS[J]. Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022, 31(7): 504-507.
    [17]
    刘姗, 马帅, 李媛. GnRH拮抗剂方案促排卵过程中平均LH水平对妊娠结局的影响[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2022, 31(5): 591-597.

    LIU S, MA S, LI Y. Effects of average LH levels during ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist protocol on pregnancy outcomes[J]. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 2022, 31(5): 591-597.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (24) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return