Volume 23 Issue 1
Jan.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Mingqing, SHENG Weiwei, CAO Guodong, XIA Guozhi, GENG Qilong, XIONG Maoming, HU Kongwang. Analysis of the safety and efficacy of proximal gastrectomy of esophageal-jejunal π-type anastomosis and circular anastomosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(1): 45-49. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003832
Citation: WANG Mingqing, SHENG Weiwei, CAO Guodong, XIA Guozhi, GENG Qilong, XIONG Maoming, HU Kongwang. Analysis of the safety and efficacy of proximal gastrectomy of esophageal-jejunal π-type anastomosis and circular anastomosis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(1): 45-49. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003832

Analysis of the safety and efficacy of proximal gastrectomy of esophageal-jejunal π-type anastomosis and circular anastomosis

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003832
Funds:

 2023zhyx-B19

 2021xjjyxm34

 2020xsxxkc247

 202210366008

  • Received Date: 2024-04-18
    Available Online: 2025-02-13
  •   Objective  Compare the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of two different digestive reconstructions: improved endoscopic esophago-jejunal π-anastomosis and open circular anastomosis in proximal gastrectomy. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of improved π-anastomosis combined with dual channel anastomosis in proximal gastrectomy.  Methods  A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 63 cases of gastric cancer who underwent laparoscopic or open proximal gastrectomy, dual-channel anastomosis in the Department of Gastroenterology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2018 to January 2023. Among them, 24 cases underwent open esophagojejunal circular anastomosis (circular anastomosis group); 39 cases of full endoscopic esophagojejunal modified π-type anastomosis were selected (π anastomosis group). Compare the clinical data, perioperative recovery, and postoperative complications of two groups of patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the improved π-type anastomosis technique.  Results  There were no differences between the π-type anastomosis group and the round astomosis group in terms of preoperative baseline data, number of lymph nodes dissected during operation, cutting edge condition, intraoperative blood loss, operation time and anastomosis time, and postoperative related complication (P>0.05), but the length of the incision [(4.92±0.53) cm vs. (14.33±1.80) cm, P < 0.001], the time of the first activity on the ground [(1.07±0.27) d vs. (1.91±0.58) d, P < 0.001], first exhaust time [(2.17±0.38) d vs. (2.91±0.58) d, t=4.652, P=0.039], the time to return to a full liquid diet, the length of postoperative hospital stay, NRS score on the third postoperative day, the incision infection, and overall postoperative complication grading, these were significant statistical differences (P < 0.05).  Conclusion  The combined esophageal-jejuno-π anastomosis and open circular anastomosis in the double-channel gastrointestinal reconstruction of proximal gastrectomy are equally safe and effective, while the π-type anastomosis is less invasive and has a faster recovery, which is a safe, feasible and worthwhile strategy for gastrointestinal reconstruction.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    SNUG H, FERLAY J, SIEGEL R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660
    [2]
    RI M, KUMAGAI K, NAMIKAWA K, et al. Is proximal gastrectomy indicated for locally advanced cancer in the upper third of the stomach?[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2021, 5(6): 767-775. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12486
    [3]
    SHIMADA H. Real-world Data related to the topics of 6th edition of gastric cancer treatment guidelines[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2021, 5(6): 730. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12511
    [4]
    NUNOBE S, IDA S. Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: a review[J]. Ann Gastroenterol Surg, 2020, 4(5): 498-504. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12365
    [5]
    MURAKAMI K, OBAMA K, TSUNODA S, et al. Linear or circular stapler? A propensity score-matched, multicenter analysis of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(12): 5265-5273. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07313-9
    [6]
    JEONG O, JUNG M R, KANG J H, et al. Reduced anastomotic complications with intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy using endoscopic linear staplers (overlap method) in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(5): 2313-2320. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07362-0
    [7]
    郭爱军, 鲁明典, 周波. 手助腹腔镜在胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(7): 1099-1102.

    GUO A J, LU M D, ZHOU B. The application of hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(7): 1099-1102.
    [8]
    王政强, 王春. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术治疗胃癌疗效比较[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2020, 37(4): 386-390.

    WANG Z Q, WANG C. Comparison of the curative effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer[J]. Journal of Xinxiang Medical University, 2020, 37(4): 386-390.
    [9]
    姬彦彬, 崔建明, 刘建, 等. 腹腔镜下双通道重建治疗近端胃癌的近期临床结局: 倾向性评分匹配分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2021, 15(2): 95-99.

    JI Y B, CUI J M, LIU J, et al. Short term outcomes of laparoscopic double-channel reconstruction for proximal gastric cancer: propensity score matching analysis[J]. Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(2): 95-99.
    [10]
    JI X, JIN C, JI K, et al. Double tract reconstruction reduces reflux esophagitis and improves quality of life after radical proximal gastrectomy for patients with upper gastric or esophagogastric adenocarcinoma[J]. Cancer Res Treat, 2021, 53(3): 784-794. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.1064
    [11]
    CHOI N R, CHOI M H, KO C S, et al. Totally laparoscopic proximalgastrectomy with double tract reconstruction: outcomes of 37consecutive cases[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2020, 15(3): 446-454. http://www.xueshufan.com/publication/3017403235
    [12]
    潘艳, 廖庆武, 盖晓冬, 等. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者围手术期营养支持治疗情况[J]. 中国临床医学, 2021, 28(2): 262-266.

    PAN Y, LIAO Q W, GAI X D, et al. Analysis of perioperative nutrition support therapy in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2021, 28(2): 262-266.
    [13]
    张晨嵩, 潘成武, 王庆康, 等. 全腹腔镜下食管-空肠π吻合在贲门癌根治术中的近期安全性研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(6): 957-961.

    ZHANG C S, PAN C W, WANG Q K, et al. A recent safety study of total laparos-copic esophageal-jejunal π anastomosis in radical carcinomectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(6): 957-961.
    [14]
    杜明南, 吴耐, 张易, 等. 全腹腔镜全胃切除术食管空肠overlap吻合与π形吻合的安全性及有效性分析[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2021, 50(9): 138-141.

    DU M N, WU N, ZHANG Y, et al. Safety and efficacy analysis of esophageal-jejunal overlapping anastomosis and π anastomosis after total laparoscopic total gastrectomy[J]. Journal of Medical Research, 2021, 50(9): 138-141.
    [15]
    ZHANG S, LI D, WANG Y, et al. A novel method for π-shaped esophagojejunostomy and double-tract reconstruction (DTR) as an alternative in totally laparoscopic or robotic proximal gastrectomy for treating upper third proximal early gastric cancer[J]. Up-dates Surg, 2021, 73(2): 597-605. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-00993-w
    [16]
    EOM B W, PARK J Y, PARK K B, et al. Comparison of nutrition and quality of life of esophagogastrostomy and the double-tract reconstruction after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(15): e25453. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025453.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (29) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return