Volume 23 Issue 9
Sep.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2025  >  23(9): 1614-1617
BAO Lichao, HE Ying. Application of precision nutrition intervention based on patient subjective holistic assessment in nursing care of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(9): 1614-1617. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004189
Citation: BAO Lichao, HE Ying. Application of precision nutrition intervention based on patient subjective holistic assessment in nursing care of patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(9): 1614-1617. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004189
shu

Application of precision nutrition intervention based on patient subjective holistic assessment in nursing care of patients with colorectal cancer

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004189

  • Department of Anorectal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou Normal University (Huzhou First People ' s Hospital), Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China

Funds:

 LTGY24H160038

  • Received Date: 2024-12-26
    Available Online: 2025-11-17
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To construct a precision nutrition intervention program for colorectal cancer based on patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), and to provide a reference for the nutritional management of similar patients.  Methods  A total of 101 patients with colorectal cancer who were treated in Huzhou First People ' s Hospital from March 2022 to March 2024 were selected and divided into a control group (n=50) and an observation group (n=51) by random number table method. The control group received conventional nutrition intervention, while the observation group received PG-SGA-based precision nutrition intervention. Nutritional status, immune function, incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions during chemotherapy, and the score of the European organization research and therapeutic tissue quality of life scale (EORTCQLQ-C30) were compared between the two groups.  Results  There was no significant difference in BMI and upper arm circumference between the observation group and the control group after intervention (P>0.05). The levels of total protein [(63.44±7.22) g/L vs. (52.09±6.73) g/L], albumin [(35.77±6.73) g/L vs. (30.12±5.25) g/L] and hemoglobin [(110.98±11.23) g/L vs. (95.45±5.67) g/L] were higher than those of control group (P < 0.05); CD3+ [(71.22±8.94) % vs. (60.09±7.85) %], CD4+ [(47.80±6.32) % vs. (39.09±5.66) %] and CD4+/CD8+(1.70±0.45 vs. 1.49±0.37) were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The total incidence of gastrointestinal adverse reactions was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The scores of EORTCQLQ-C30 were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05).  Conclusion  Precise nutritional intervention based on PG-SGA can improve the nutritional status of colorectal cancer patients, improve immune function, reduce the adverse reactions of chemotherapy, and improve the quality of life.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    CHONMAITREE P, SUDCHAROEN A, POONYAM P, et al. Comparison of Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for nutritional assessment in hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2025, 33(2): 116.
    [2]
    FUCHS-TARLOVSKY V, VELASCO GIMENO C, ARIAS-SOBERÓN M D, et al. Translation, cultural adaptation, and assessment of the linguistic and content validity of the PG-SGA to the Spanish linguistic setting by cancer patients and healthcare professionals[J]. Nutrition, 2024, 128(11): 112567. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2024.112567.
    [3]
    余文娟, 郑红建, 余双娟, 等. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者PG-SGA评分与不良预后风险的相关性[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(4): 586-588, 681. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003456

    YU W J, ZHENG H J, YU S J, et al. Association between PG-SGA scores and the risk of poor outcomes in stroke patients with dysphagia[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(4): 586-588, 681. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003456
    [4]
    刘晓妹, 陈文秀, 孙甜甜. 基于PG-SGA评估的针对性膳食管理对胃癌术后化疗患者的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2022, 19(22): 3428-3433.

    LIU X M, CHEN W X, SUN T T. Effect of targeted dietary management based on PG-SGA assessment on postoperative chemotherapy patients with gastric cancer[J]. Nursing Practice and Research, 2022, 19(22): 3428-3433.
    [5]
    赵建兰, 王瑞景, 程慧. 基于自评-主观全面量表的个体化营养干预对妇科肿瘤术后化疗患者营养状态及免疫功能的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2023, 21(2): 169-172.

    ZHAO J L, WANG R J, CHENG H. Effect of patient-generated subjective global assessment based individualized nutritional intervention on nutritional status and immune function of patients with gynecological tumors undergoing postoperative chemotherapy[J]. Oncology Progress, 2023, 21(2): 169-172.
    [6]
    洪洁. 基于患者主观整体评估的多学科团队管理在肺癌患者术后营养管理中的应用[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2022, 19(6): 837-840.

    HONG J. Application of multidisciplinary team management based on patient subjective holistic assessment in postoperative nutritional management of lung cancer patients[J]. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2022, 19(6): 837-840.
    [7]
    马月, 吴蓓雯. 癌症患者营养管理指南解读[J]. 上海护理, 2017, 17(2): 10-15.

    MA Y, WU B W. Interpretation of nutritional management guidelines for cancer patients[J]. Shanghai Nursing, 2017, 17(2): 10-15.
    [8]
    祝芸, 张淑丹. PG-SGA与NRS2002评估筛查下营养支持方案改良促进老年急性胰腺炎临床预后效果分析[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊), 2022, 29(2): 58-61.

    ZHU Y, ZHNAG S D. PG-SGA and NRS2002 to evaluate the effect of improved nutritional support under screening to promote clinical prognosis in elderly patients with acute pancreatitis[J]. Modern Nurse, 2022, 29(2): 58-61.
    [9]
    龚钰, 田婧汝, 陈盼, 等. 脑瘤患者生活质量测定量表EORTCQLQ-C30、QLQ-BN20的中文版评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(6): 490-494, 500.

    GONG Y, TIAN J R, CHNE P, et al. Evaluation of the Chinese version of EORTCQLQ-C30, QLQ-BN20 for brain tumor patients[J]. Journal of Nurses Training, 2020, 35(6): 490-494, 500.
    [10]
    汤权琪, 周美玲, 徐皖湘. PG-SGA联合生物电阻抗相位角分析技术的个性化营养干预在胃癌化疗中的应用[J]. 安徽医学, 2022, 43(7): 804-808.

    TANG Q Q, ZHOU M L, XU W X. The application of personalized nutritional intervention combining PG-SGA with bioelectrical impedance phase Angle analysis technology in chemotherapy for gastric cancer[J]. Anhui Medical Journal, 2022, 43(7): 804-808.
    [11]
    张延萍, 何志婷, 张倩. 基于PG-SGA的个体化营养干预对血液透析患者营养状态及磷管理效果的影响[J]. 海南医学, 2023, 34(8): 1174-1178.

    ZHANG Y P, HE Z T, ZHNAG Q. Effect of individualized nutritional intervention based on PG-SGA on nutritional status and phosphorus management in patients undergoing hemodialysis[J]. Hainan Medical Journal, 2023, 34(8): 1174-1178.
    [12]
    浦伟青, 王晶晶, 秦娜梅, 等. 基于PG-SGA的个体化营养干预在中晚期食管癌患者术后化疗中的临床应用研究[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2021, 40(2): 306-309.

    PU W Q, WANG J J, QIN N M, et al. Clinical application of individualized nutrition intervention based on PG-SGA in postoperative chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer[J]. International Journal of Nursing, 2021, 40(2): 306-309.
    [13]
    王莹, 张凤莲, 苏莹. 基于患者自评-主观全面评定量表的个性化营养干预在胃癌术后化疗患者中的应用效果[J]. 癌症进展, 2024, 22(3): 269-273.

    WANG Y, ZHANG F L, SU Y. Application effect of personalized nutrition intervention based on patient generated subjective global assessment in patients with gastric cancer undergoing postoperative chemotherapy[J]. Oncology Progress, 2024, 22(3): 269-273.
    [14]
    陈思芮, 陈英, 吴莉莉, 等. 六种衰弱评估工具对老年结直肠癌患者术后短期不良结局的预测性能比较[J]. 中国临床研究, 2024, 37(2): 236-241.

    CHEN S R, CHEN Y, WU L L, et al. Comparison of six frailty assessment tools for predicting short-term adverse outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients after surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Research, 2024, 37(2): 236-241.
    [15]
    肖霞, 郭轶, 王童, 等. 基于PG-SGA的个性化营养干预方案对结直肠癌患者术后的影响[J]. 贵州医科大学学报, 2022, 47(6): 740-744.

    XIAO X, GUO Y, WANG T, et al. Effects of PG-SGA personalized nutritional intervention on postoperative care for patients with colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Guizhou Medical University, 2022, 47(6): 740-744.
    [16]
    蒋琳, 蒋琼, 苗培培, 等. 精准营养干预对前列腺癌术后化疗患者营养状态、化疗不良反应的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2024, 22(11): 1247-1251.

    JIANG L, JIANG Q, MIAO P P, et al. Effects of precision nutrition intervention on nutritional status and adverse reactions of prostate cancer patients undergoing postoperative chemotherapy[J]. Oncology Progress, 2024, 22(11): 1247-1251.
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(5)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (8) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return