The mediating role of loneliness and social support between stigma and social avoidance in rural breast cancer survivors
-
摘要:
目的 探讨农村乳腺癌幸存者病耻感与社交回避之间的关系，分析社会支持的调节作用，为促进社会融合提供理论支撑。 方法 采用便利抽样选取2021年11月—2022年6月蚌埠市2所三甲医院260例农村乳腺癌幸存者为研究对象，采用社会影响量表(SIS)、孤独感量表(UCLA-8)、领悟社会支持量表(PSSS)、社交回避量表对其进行问卷调查，运用Pearson相关性分析及SPSS Process程序进行调节中介检验。 结果 (1) 农村乳腺癌幸存者病耻感、孤独感、社交回避和社会支持得分分别为(63.06±7.33)分、(18.54±4.31)分、(7.48±3.54)分、(58.86±8.78)分；病耻感与孤独感和社交回避呈正相关关系(r=0.563、0.543，均P＜0.001)，孤独感与社交回避呈正相关关系(r=0.536，P＜0.001)。(2)孤独感在病耻感与社交回避间起部分中介作用，中介效应占35%。(3)领悟社会支持在病耻感和孤独感间起调节作用(t=2.533，P=0.012)，且随着社会支持的升高病耻感对孤独感的影响逐渐降低。 结论 病耻感增加了患者不良社交体验，并通过孤独感产生间接影响；而农村患者社会支持相对局限，对减轻孤独感有意义，但不足以调节社交行为。医护人员可以从降低病耻感和孤独感的角度出发，并结合患者情感、认知、生活环境等多方因素制定有效的干预指导措施，促进其社会融合。 Abstract:Objective To explore the relationship between stigma and social avoidance in rural breast cancer survivors, and to analyze the moderating effect of social support in order to provide a theoretical basis for promoting social integration. Methods A total of 260 rural breast cancer survivors were selected by convenience sampling from 2 grade A hospitals in Bengbu City from November 2021 to June 2022. They were administered questionnaires using social impact scale (SIS), loneliness scale (UCLA-8), perceived social support scale (PSSS), and social avoidance scale. Pearson correlation analysis and SPSS Process program were used to mediate the test. Results (1) The scores of stigma, loneliness, social avoidance and social support of rural breast cancer survivors were (63.06±7.33) points, (18.54±4.31) points, (7.48±3.54) points and (58.86±8.78) points.; stigma was positively correlated with loneliness and social avoidance (r=0.563, 0.543, all P < 0.001), and loneliness was positively correlated with social avoidance (r=0.536, P < 0.001). (2) Loneliness partially mediated the relationship between stigma and social avoidance, accounting for 35%. (3) Social support had a moderating effect on the relationship between stigma and loneliness (t=2.533, P=0.012), and the influence of stigma on loneliness gradually decreased as social support increased. Conclusion Stigma increases patients ' negative social experiences and affects them indirectly through loneliness; among rural patients, social support was relatively limited, which was important in alleviating loneliness but could not improve social behavior. From the perspective of reducing stigma and loneliness, medical staff develop effective interventions to promote patients ' social integration by combining emotional, cognitive, environmental and other factors. -
Key words:
- Breast cancer survivors /
- Stigma /
- Loneliness /
- Social avoidance /
- Perceived social support
-
图 1 孤独感和社会支持在乳腺癌幸存者病耻感和社交回避关系中的假设模型
Figure 1. A hypothetical model exploring the relationship between stigma, social avoidance, loneliness, and social support in breast cancer survivors
图 2 社会支持在病耻感与孤独感之间的调节效应
Figure 2. The moderating role of social support in the relationship between stigma and loneliness
表 1 260例乳腺癌幸存者一般资料
Table 1. General information for 260 survivors with breast cancer
项目 例数 百分比(%) 项目 例数 百分比(%) 年龄(岁) 肿瘤分期 ＜45 68 26.2 一期 42 16.2 46~55 127 48.8 二期 155 59.6 ＞56 65 25.0 三期 63 24.2 受教育程度 病程(年) 小学及以下 128 49.2 ＜1 107 41.1 初高中 118 45.4 1~2 94 36.2 大学及以上 14 5.4 ＞2 59 22.7 家庭人均月收入(元) 治疗方式 ＜2 500 184 70.8 手术 9 3.5 2 500~5 000 69 26.5 手术+化疗 172 66.1 ＞5 000 7 2.7 手术+放化疗 79 30.4 职业 居住状态 在职 21 8.1 独居 12 4.6 无业 209 80.4 与配偶 81 31.2 自由职业 16 6.1 与子女 23 8.8 退休 14 5.4 与配偶及子女 144 55.4 婚姻状况 并发淋巴水肿 已婚 253 97.3 是 41 15.8 离异或丧偶 7 2.7 否 219 84.2 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 各变量间相关性分析(r值)
Table 2. Correlation analysis among variables (r value)
项目 社会支持 病耻感 孤独感 社交回避 社会支持 1 病耻感 -0.392 1 孤独感 -0.538 0.563 1 社交回避 -0.315 0.543 0.536 1 注：均P < 0.001。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 孤独感在乳腺癌患者病耻感和社交回避间的中介效应检验
Table 3. The mediating effect of loneliness on stigma and social avoidance in breast cancer survivors
结果变量 预测变量 整体拟合指数 回归系数显著性 R R2 F β t值 P值 社交回避 病耻感 0.543 0.295 107.739 0.262 10.380 0.001 孤独感 病耻感 0.563 0.317 119.964 0.331 10.953 0.001 社交回避 孤独感 0.610 0.372 76.230 0.170 5.893 0.001 病耻感 0.277 5.643 0.001
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 总效应、直接效应和中介效应分解表
Table 4. Tables for total, direct, and intermediate effects
效应类型 效应值 Boot标准误 Boot CI下限 Boot CI上限 效应占比(%) 直接效应 0.170 0.029 0.114 0.227 65.00 间接效应 0.092 0.020 0.058 0.135 35.00 总效应 0.262 0.025 0.213 0.312
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 有调节的中介效应检验
Table 5. Test for moderated mediating effect
变量 方程1：社交回避 方程2：孤独感 方程3：社交回避 β t值 P值 95% CI β t值 P值 95% CI β t值 P值 95% CI 病耻感 0.351 5.773 < 0.001 0.231~0.471 0.421 8.344 < 0.001 0.321~0.520 孤独感 0.355 5.283 < 0.001 0.222~0.487 社会支持 0.008 0.134 0.894 -0.109~0.125 -0.375 -7.437 < 0.001 -0.474~-0.275 0.013 0.213 0.831 -0.104~0.130 病耻感×社会支持 -0.017 -0.364 0.716 -0.108~0.075 0.109 2.533 0.012 0.024~0.193 孤独感×社会支持 -0.054 -1.112 0.267 -0.150~0.042 R2 0.373 0.450 0.375 F值 37.876a 69.905a 38.315a 注：aP＜0.001。
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] SU M, HUA X, WANG J, et al. Health-related quality of life among cancer survivors in rural China[J]. Qual Life Res, 2019, 28(3): 695-702. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2038-6 [2] 刘玉瑶, 张晓芳, 魏洁丽, 等. 乳腺癌患者疾病接受度现状及影响因素的研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(12): 38-41.LIU Y Y, ZHANG X F, WEI J L, et al. Status Quo of Acceptance of Illness among Breast Cancer Patients and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Nursing Journal of Chinese People ' s Liberation Army, 2021, 38(12): 38-41. [3] 尹春岚, 曲慧利, 杨富国, 等. 青年乳腺癌术后患者心理社会适应现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2019, 19(7): 457-461. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2019.07.001YIN C L, QU H L, YANG F G, et al. Psychosocial adjustment and influencing factors of young patients with breast cancer[J]. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2019, 19(7): 457-461. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2019.07.001 [4] NGUYEN A W, TAYLOR R J, TAYLOR H O, et al. Objective and subjective social isolation and psychiatric disorders among African Americans[J]. Clin Soc Work J, 2020, 48(1): 87-98. doi: 10.1007/s10615-019-00725-z [5] JIN R, XIE T, ZHANG L, et al. Stigma and its influencing factors among breast cancer survivors in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2021, 52: 101972. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101972. [6] 金慧英, 张孝静, 方群, 等. 乳腺癌术后患者社交回避与苦恼现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(7): 1613-1616.JIN H Y, ZHANG X J, FANG Q, et al. Social avoidance and distress status and influencing factors in postoperative breast cancer patients[J]. Maternal and Child Health Care of China, 2021, 36(7): 1613-1616. [7] 袁野, 黄睿智, 姜素华, 等. 越焦虑越回避: 孤独感、信任感的中介作用与幸福感的调节作用[J]. 温州医科大学学报, 2021, 51(10): 852-856, 861. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2021.10.017YUAN Y, HUANG R Z, JIANG S H, et al. The more anxious, the more avoidant: The mediating role of loneliness, trust and the moderating role of Happiness[J]. Journal of Wenzhou Medical University, 2021, 51(10): 852-856, 861. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9400.2021.10.017 [8] ALVI T, KUMAR D, TABAK B A. Social anxiety and behavioral assessments of social cognition: a systematic review[J]. J Affect Disord, 2022, 311: 17-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.130. [9] 王国民, 郑利锋, 周波, 等. 社会支持与失独者抑郁、孤独感及生活质量的关系分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(4): 622-624, 640. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000751WANG G M, ZHENG L F, ZHOU B, et al. Analysis of the relationship among social support, depression, loneliness and quality of life about the parents who lost their only child[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2019, 17(4): 622-624, 640. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000751 [10] HUTTEN E, JONGEN E M M, VOS ANIQUE E C C, et al. Loneliness and mental health: the mediating effect of perceived social support[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(22): 11963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211963 [11] 陈卓园园, 孙子科技木, 王小梅, 等. 住院癌症病人孤独感的影响因素研究[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(7): 1154-1158.CHEN Z Y Y, SUN Z K J M, WANG X M, et al. Study on influencing factors of loneliness in hospitalized cancer patients[J]. Chinese Nursing Research, 2022, 36(7): 1154-1158. [12] 魏强, 苏寒云, 吕静, 等. 家庭规模、社会支持、健康状况对农村老年女性主观幸福感的影响研究[J]. 西北人口, 2020, 41(5): 106-115.WEI Q, SU H Y, LYU J, et al. Research on the Influence of Family Size, Social Support, Health Status on the Subjective Well-being of Rural Elderly Women[J]. Northwest Population Journal, 2020, 41(5): 106-115. [13] 吴俊林, 陈霞, 戴浩然, 等. 样本及其统计量性质对临床医学研究统计方法恰当选择的影响[J]. 四川精神卫生, 2020, 33(6): 527-531, 495.WEI J L, CHEN X, DAI H R, et al. Impact of sample and its statistical properties on the appropriate choice of statistical methods in medical research[J]. Sichuan Mental Health, 2020, 33(6): 527-531, 495. [14] 周丽, 施洁, 唐敏, 等. 接纳与承诺疗法对直肠癌肠造口患者病耻感的干预效果研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2022, 38(16): 2708-2711, 2716.ZHOU L, SHI J, TANG M, et al. Intervention effect of acceptance and commitment therapy on the stigma of rectal cancer patients with enterostomy[J]. Journal of Modern Medicine & Health, 2022, 38(16): 2708-2711, 2716. [15] 施伟慧, 朱晓萍, 袁晓宇, 等. 心理资本在助产士领悟社会支持与留职意愿的中介效应研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(6): 982-985. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001966SHI W H, ZHU X P, YUAN X Y, et al. The mediating effect of psychological capital on perceived social support and intent to stay in midwives[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(6): 982-985. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001966 [16] 高梦雅, 蔡立柏, 李贝, 等. 乳腺癌患者社交回避与苦恼的研究进展[J]. 中国临床护理, 2022, 14(5): 324-329.GAO M Y, CAI L B, LI B, et al. Research progress of social avoidance and distress among breast cancer patients[J]. Chinese Clinical Nursing, 2022, 14(5): 324-329. [17] LIN C Y, TSAI C S, FAN C W, et al. Psychometric evaluation of three versions of the UCLA loneliness scale (Full, Eight-Item, and Three-Item Versions) among sexual minority men in Taiwan[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(13): 8095. [18] 彭顺, 汪夏, 牛更枫, 等. 负面评价恐惧对社交焦虑的影响: 基于社交焦虑的认知行为模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 121-128.PENG S, WANG X, NIU G F, et al. Fear of negative evaluation on social anxiety: base on cognitive behavioral model of social anxiety disorder[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(1): 121-128. [19] 何东梅, 胡建萍, 高茜, 等. 乳腺癌根治术后患者病耻感的描述性现象学研究[J]. 现代临床护理, 2020, 19(10): 1-7.HE D M, HU J P, GAO Q, et al. Stigma of patients after radical mastectomy from the phenomenological perspective[J]. Modern Clinical Nursing, 2020, 19(10): 1-7. [20] 欧阳瑛. 中青年乳腺癌患者反刍性沉思对其创伤后成长的影响研究[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2020, 36(22): 3649-3650.OUYANG Y. The effect of rumination on post-traumatic growth in young and middle-aged patients with breast cancer[J]. Journal of Modern Medicine & Health, 2020, 36(22): 3649-3650. [21] LAYDEN E A, CACIOPPO J T, CACIOPPO S. Loneliness predicts a preference for larger interpersonal distance within intimate space[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(9): e0203491. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203491. [22] LIEBERZ J, SHAMAY S G, SAPORTA N, et al. Behavioral and neural dissociation of social anxiety and loneliness[J]. J Neurosci, 2022, 42(12): 2570-2583. [23] 朱亚鑫, 吴炜, 张怀文, 等. 老年人心理健康与社会支持的关系研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2022, 39(5): 699-701, 706.ZHU Y X, WU W, ZHANG H W, et al. Research on the relationship between the mental health and social support of the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics, 2022, 39(5): 699-701, 706. [24] 孙佳璐, 卜彤, 陈育红, 等. 家庭复原力在缓解乳腺肿瘤患者焦虑和抑郁中的作用[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2022, 30(1): 22-27.SUN J L, BU T, CHEN Y H, et al. Role of family resilience in alleviating anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2022, 30(1): 22-27. [25] LIU B, WU X, SHI L, et al. Correlations of social isolation and anxiety and depression symptoms among patients with breast cancer of Heilongjiang province in China: the mediating role of social support[J]. Nurs Open, 2021, 8(4): 1981-1989. -
点击查看大图
图(2) / 表(5)
计量
- 文章访问数: 277
- HTML全文浏览量: 116
- PDF下载量: 26
- 被引次数: 0
