留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

冠心病伴二尖瓣反流患者全因死亡率的危险因素分析

迪丽胡玛尔·艾力 再努拉·依明 祖丽皮耶姆·希尔 彭辉

迪丽胡玛尔·艾力, 再努拉·依明, 祖丽皮耶姆·希尔, 彭辉. 冠心病伴二尖瓣反流患者全因死亡率的危险因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(11): 1830-1833. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004238
引用本文: 迪丽胡玛尔·艾力, 再努拉·依明, 祖丽皮耶姆·希尔, 彭辉. 冠心病伴二尖瓣反流患者全因死亡率的危险因素分析[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(11): 1830-1833. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004238
Dilihumaer·Aili, Zainula·Yiming, Zulipiyemu·Xier, PENG Hui. Analysis of risk factors affecting all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease with mitral regurgitation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(11): 1830-1833. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004238
Citation: Dilihumaer·Aili, Zainula·Yiming, Zulipiyemu·Xier, PENG Hui. Analysis of risk factors affecting all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease with mitral regurgitation[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(11): 1830-1833. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004238

冠心病伴二尖瓣反流患者全因死亡率的危险因素分析

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004238
基金项目: 

新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发计划项目 2022B03009-3

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    彭辉,E-mail: lucy-ph@163.com

  • 中图分类号: R541.4R542.51

Analysis of risk factors affecting all-cause mortality in patients with coronary artery disease with mitral regurgitation

  • 摘要:   目的  冠心病(CAD)发病率持续上升,二尖瓣反流(MR)是最常见的心脏瓣膜疾病,本研究旨在探讨冠心病伴MR患者的临床特征,分析影响预后的危险因素。  方法  本研究纳入2018年1月—2023年12月在新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院住院时诊断为冠心病且伴有二尖瓣反流的813例患者,中位随访时间为2.5年,以全因死亡为终点事件,根据是否发生终点事件将患者分为终点事件组(314例)和非终点事件组(499例)。采用Cox回归分析研究影响患者预后的因素。通过ROC曲线评估左房内径(LAD)、左室舒张期末内径(LVEDD)、左室收缩期末内径(LVESD)对预后的预测能力,并根据Youden指数确定最佳截断值,利用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析生存情况。  结果  变量校正后,LAD(HR=1.031,95% CI:1.015~1.048)、LVEDD(HR=1.057,95% CI:1.043~1.071)、LVESD(HR=1.046,95% CI:1.031~1.062)增大均是冠心病伴MR患者发生终点事件的危险因素(P < 0.001)。ROC曲线显示,LAD、LVEDD、LVESD对冠心病伴MR患者远期全因死亡具有预测能力(AUC分别为0.666、0.755、0.761,P<0.001),最佳截断值分别为42.5 mm、49.5 mm、37.5 mm;Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,超过上述阈值者生存率显著降低(log-rank χ2=59.737、123.156、171.803,P<0.001)。  结论  心脏超声心动图指标对冠心病伴二尖瓣反流患者预后有预测价值,其中LAD、LVEDD、LVESD增大是患者发生终点事件的危险因素。

     

  • 图  1  LAD、LVEDD、LVESD预测CAD-MR患者预后的ROC曲线

    Figure  1.  ROC curves of LAD, LVEDD, and LVESD for predicting the prognosis of patients with CAD-MR

    图  2  LAD≥42.5 mm时CAD-MR患者全因死亡K-M曲线

    Figure  2.  K-M curve for all-cause mortality in CAD-MR patients with LAD≥42.5 mm

    图  3  LVEDD≥49.5 mm时CAD-MR患者全因死亡K-M曲线

    Figure  3.  K-M curve for all-cause mortality in CAD-MR patients with LVEDD≥49.5 mm

    图  4  LVESD≥37.5 mm时CAD-MR患者全因死亡K-M曲线

    Figure  4.  K-M curve for all-cause mortality in CAD-MR with LVESD ≥37.5 mm

    表  1  2组冠心病伴MR患者一般资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of general data between the two groups of CHD patients with MR

    项目 终点事件组(n=314) 非终点事件组(n=499) 统计量 P
    年龄[M(P25, P75),岁] 74(65,81) 69(60,77) 5.610a <0.001
    性别[例(%)] 0.466b 0.495
       男性 185(58.9) 306(61.3)
       女性 129(41.1) 193(38.7)
    高血压[例(%)] 210(66.9) 346(69.3) 0.539b 0.463
    糖尿病[例(%)] 116(36.9) 178(35.7) 0.135b 0.713
    吸烟史[例(%)] 74(23.6) 126(25.3) 0.295b 0.587
    经皮冠状动脉介入术[例(%)] 92(29.3) 156(31.3) 0.350b 0.554
    NYHA Ⅳ级[例(%)] 131(41.7) 117(23.4) 30.355b <0.001
    收缩压(x±s,mmHg) 129.35±23.31 131.28±21.90 2.769c 0.006
    白细胞(x±s,109/L) 7.20±2.90 7.14±2.66 0.330c 0.741
    红细胞[M(P25, P75),109/L] 4.33(3.74,4.79) 4.45(4.01,4.89) 1.246a 0.087
    血红蛋白[M(P25, P75),g/L] 127(109,142) 133(120,144) -3.760a <0.001
    D-二聚体[M(P25, P75),mg/L] 1.04(0.50,2.03) 0.65(0.35,1.42) 4.639a <0.001
    肌酐[M(P25, P75),μmol/L] 84.25(67.25,120.38) 75.90(62.40,97.00) 2.017a 0.044
    尿酸[M(P25, P75),μmol/L] 382.82(308.25,492.79) 366.00(289.00,448.84) 3.010a 0.003
    注:aZ值,b为χ2值,ct值;1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2组冠心病伴MR患者超声指标比较(mm)

    Table  2.   Comparison of ultrasound parameters between the two groups of patients with coronary heart disease and MR (mm)

    组别 例数 RVD
    (x±s)
    PAD
    [M(P25, P75)]
    LAD
    [M(P25, P75)]
    IVS
    (x±s)
    LVEDD
    [M(P25, P75)]
    LVESD
    [M(P25, P75)]
    终点事件组 314 22.12±3.37 21.00(20.00,23.00) 44.00(41.75,47.00) 10.99±1.19 56.00(50.00,64.00) 42.00(39.00,46.00)
    非终点事件组 499 21.82±2.66 20.00(20.00,22.00) 42.00(38.00,46.00) 10.96±1.42 48.00(45.00,52.00) 34.00(28.00,41.00)
    统计量 1.340a 2.863b 6.452b 0.242a 13.078b 14.145b
    P 0.181 0.004 <0.001 0.809 <0.001 <0.001
    注:at值,bZ值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  预测冠心病伴MR组患者发生终点事件的单因素及多因素Cox回归分析

    Table  3.   Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses predicting the occurrence of endpoint events after 2.5 years of follow-up in the group of patients with coronary artery disease with MR

    变量 单因素分析 多因素分析
    HR(95% CI) P HR(95% CI) P
    年龄 1.023(1.013~1.034) < 0.001 1.037(1.026~1.048) < 0.001
    RVD 1.021(0.986~1.058) 0.240 0.958(0.917~1.001) 0.053
    PAD 1.048(1.010~1.086) 0.012 0.994(0.947~1.043) 0.795
    LAD 1.060(1.045~1.076) < 0.001 1.031(1.015~1.048) < 0.001
    IVS 1.011(0.932~1.096) 0.797 1.020(0.937~1.110) 0.646
    LVEDD 1.077(1.066~1.089) < 0.001 1.057(1.043~1.071) < 0.001
    LVESD 1.069(1.056~1.081) < 0.001 1.046(1.031~1.062) < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] YAN Z S, ZHANG N C, LI K, et al. Upregulation of long non-coding RNA myocardial infarction-associated transcription is correlated with coronary artery stenosis and elevated inflammation in patients with coronary atherosclerotic heart disease[J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2021, 37(12): 1038-1047. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12444
    [2] 黄万众, 苏强. 冠心病与精神心理疾病的相关性与研究现状[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(7): 1212-1216.

    HUANG W Z, SU Q. The correlation and research status of coronary heart disease and psychiatric disorders[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2024, 22(7): 1212-1216.
    [3] VAHANIAN A, BEYERSDORF F, PRAZ F, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: developed by the Task Force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2022, 43(7): 561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395
    [4] 董桂福, 王宇航, 葛建军. 不停跳冠脉搭桥心肌保护技术在瓣膜疾病合并冠心病手术中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(10): 1650-1653.

    DONG G F, WANG Y H, GE J J. Application analysis of myocardial protection technique for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the operation of valve disease combined with coronary heart disease[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(10): 1650-1653.
    [5] ZEGARD A, OKAFOR O, DE BONO J, et al. Myocardial fibrosis as a predictor of sudden death in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2021, 77(1): 29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.046
    [6] ARORA S, SIVARAJ K, HENDRICKSON M, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of mitral regurgitation in acute decompensated heart failure: the ARIC study[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2021, 9(3): 179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.09.015
    [7] HARADA T, NASER J A, TADA A, et al. Cardiac function, haemodynamics, and valve competence with exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and mild to moderate secondary mitral regurgitation[J]. Eur J Heart Fail, 2024, 26(7): 1616-1627. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3322
    [8] COLLET J P, THIELE H, BARBATO E, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J, 2021, 42(14): 1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
    [9] MARCHETTI D, DI LENARDA F, NOVEMBRE M L, et al. Contemporary echocardiographic evaluation of mitral regurgitation and guidance for percutaneous mitral valve repair[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(22): 7121. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12227121.
    [10] RETHEMIOTAKI I. Global prevalence of cardiovascular diseases by gender and age during 2010-2019[J]. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis, 2023, 8: e196-e205.
    [11] O'GARA P T, MACK M J. Secondary mitral regurgitation[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 383(15): 1458-1467. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1903331
    [12] CHEHAB O, ROBERTS-THOMSON R, NG YIN LING C, et al. Secondary mitral regurgitation: pathophysiology, proportionality and prognosis[J]. Heart, 2020, 106(10): 716-723. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316238
    [13] VON JEINSEN B, SHORT M I, LARSON M G, et al. Prognostic significance of echocardiographic measures of cardiac remodeling[J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2020, 33(1): 72-81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.08.001
    [14] FERNANDES L P, BARRETO A T F, NETO M G, et al. Prognostic power of conventional echocardiography in individuals without history of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo), 2021, 76: e2754. DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2754.
    [15] ZILBERSZAC R, GLEISS A, MASSETTI M, et al. Left atrial size predicts outcome in severe but asymptomatic mitral regurgitation[J]. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1): 3892. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31163-0.
    [16] 李雨濛, 吴华芹, 张并璇, 等. 左室舒张末期内径对慢性心力衰竭患者远期预后的预测价值[J]. 中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2022, 14(11): 1341-1344, 1348.

    LI Y M, WU H Q, ZHANG B X, et al. Predictive value of left ventricular end-diastolic inner diameter to long-term prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine, 2022, 14(11): 1341-1344, 1348.
    [17] DUGGAN J P, PETERS A S, TRACHIOTIS G D, et al. Epidemiology of coronary artery disease[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2022, 102(3): 499-516. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.01.007
  • 加载中
图(4) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-09-27
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-01-07

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回