Clinical analysis of NETs biomarkers and their relationship with leukocytes and neutrophils in empyema-associated pleural effusion
-
摘要:
目的 探究脓胸患者胸腔积液中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网(NETs)生物标志与白细胞、中性粒细胞以及炎症指标C反应蛋白(CRP)之间的相关性,为临床脓胸患者的诊治提供参考。 方法 收集2017年6月—2021年6月广西医科大学第一附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科三病区脓胸患者资料,无菌采集胸腔积液样本,严格筛选后纳入38例样本及临床数据。采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测胸腔积液NETs标志物水平,汇总数据并进行统计学分析。 结果 38例脓胸患者胸腔积液样本中,白细胞、中性粒细胞、C反应蛋白和NETs生物标志物水平均呈现升高的趋势。瓜氨酸化组蛋白H3(citH3)浓度为14.63(0.99, 21.45)ng/mL,胞外DNA(eDNA)浓度为14.09(3.22, 21.93)ng/μL,白细胞计数为(15.08±8.15)×109/L,中性粒细胞计数为[12.04(7.57, 17.99)]×109/L,C反应蛋白为100.50(44.63, 187.00)mg/L;其中胸腔积液微生物培养阳性组citH3浓度为19.12(0.37, 21.23)ng/mL,eDNA浓度为13.15(4.48, 19.62)ng/μL,白细胞计数为(15.58±5.23) ×109/L,中性粒细胞计数为[14.92(12.21, 16.73)]×109/L,C反应蛋白为147.00(103.50, 189.75)mg/L。Spearman相关性分析显示,微生物培养阳性胸腔积液组的citH3水平与白细胞计数、中性粒细胞计数相关(r=0.833、0.867,P<0.05),其余各组指标间未发现显著相关性。 结论 eDNA、citH3与白细胞、中性粒细胞及C反应蛋白密切相关,可在一定程度上有效评估脓胸的炎症水平与疾病进展。 -
关键词:
- 脓胸 /
- 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网 /
- 白细胞 /
- 中性粒细胞
Abstract:Objective To investigate the correlation between neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in pleural fluid and leukocytes, neutrophils, and the inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with empyema, in order to provide references for clinical diagnosis and treatment. Methods Clinical data were collected from patients with pyothorax admitted to the Third Ward of the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, from June 2017 to June 2021. Pleural effusion samples were collected under sterile conditions, and 38 eligible samples along with corresponding clinical data were included after rigorous screening. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the levels of NETs markers in pleural effusion, and all data were summarized and statistically analyzed. Results The data showed a trend of elevated leukocytes, neutrophils, and NETs biomarkers were observed in 38 pleural fluid samples. The concentration of citrullinated histone H3 (citH3) was 14.63(0.99, 21.45) ng/mL, and extracellular DNA (eDNA) 14.09(3.22, 21.93) ng/μL. The leukocytes count was (15.08±8.15)×109/L, the count of neutrophils was [12.04(7.57, 17.99)]×109/L, and CRP level was 100.50(44.63, 187.00) mg/L. In the group with positive pleural fluid microbial cultures, the concentrations were as follows: citH3 at 19.12(0.37, 21.23)ng/mL, eDNA at 13.15(4.48, 19.62)ng/μL, white blood cell count at (15.58±5.23)×109/L, neutrophil count at [14.92(12.21, 16.73)]×109/L, and C-reactive protein level at 147.00(103.50, 189.75) mg/L. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that, in the microbial culture-positive pleural fluid group, citH3 levels were highly correlated with both leukocytes count and neutrophil count (r=0.833, 0.867, P < 0.05). No other significant correlations were observed among the remaining indicators across the groups. Conclusion NET biomarkers, particularly eDNA and citH3, are associated with white blood cells, neutrophils, and C-reactive protein, and may serve as potential indicators for assessing inflammatory severity and disease progression in empyema. -
Key words:
- Empyema /
- Neutrophil extracellular traps /
- Leukocytes /
- Neutrophils
-
表 1 胸腔积液样本微生物培养阴性组及阳性组各指标情况
Table 1. Comparison of indicators between culture-negative and culture-positive groups of pleural fluid samples
组别 例数 eDNA[M(P25, P75, ng/μL] citH3[M(P25, P75, ng/mL] 白细胞($\bar{x} \pm s$,×109/L) 中性粒细胞[M(P25, P75, 109/L] C反应蛋白[M(P25, P75, mg/L] 阴性组 29 16.72(3.09, 22.52) 14.59(1.10, 21.50) 14.94±7.54 10.04(7.46, 18.14) 68.65(35.25, 185.75) 阳性组 9 13.15(4.48, 19.62) 19.12(0.37, 21.23) 15.58±5.23 14.92(12.21, 16.73) 147.00(103.50, 189.75) 注:白细胞正常值范围为(3.50~9.50)×109/L,中性粒细胞正常值范围(1.80~6.30)×109/L,C反应蛋白正常值范围为0.00~10.00 mg/L。 -
[1] SEAN P, FOLEY F, PARRISH J S, et al. Pleural space infections[J]. Life, 2023, 13(2): 376. doi: 10.3390/life13020376 [2] SHIRAISHI Y, OMASA M, YAMASHITA Y, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of empyema(The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery)[J]. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2025, 73(5): 312-327. doi: 10.1007/s11748-025-02119-0 [3] BHATNAGAR M, CHEW W M, GOH K J, et al. Management of parapneumonic effusion and empyema[J]. Clin Chest Med, 2025, 46(2): 241-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2025.02.003 [4] ZHANG H, WANG Y H Z, QU M D, et al. Neutrophil, neutrophil extracellular traps and endothelial cell dysfunction in sepsis[J]. Clin Transl Med, 2023, 13(1): e1170. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1170. [5] BAZ A A, HAO H F, LAN S M, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in bacterial infections and evasion strategies[J]. Front Immunol, 2024, 15: 1357967. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1357967. [6] POLI V, ZANONI I. Neutrophil intrinsic and extrinsic regulation of NETosis in health and disease[J]. Trends Microbiol, 2022, 31(3): 380-293. [7] WANG Y T, SHEN J Y, OUYANG J F, et al. Bibliometric and visual analysis of neutrophil extracellular traps from 2004 to 2022[J]. Front Immunol, 2022, 13: 1025861. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1025861. [8] 刘芳, 王晓蓓. 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网对急性脑梗死患者病情及预后的评估价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(17): 127-132.LIU F, WANG X B. Value of plasma neutrophil extracellular traps on illness condition and prognosis in patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(17): 127-132. [9] 丁雨, 吴艳, 卞涛. 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网在肺部疾病中作用的研究进展[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2023, 43(3): 481-485.DING Y, WU Y, BIAN T. Research progress on the role of neutrophil extracellular traps in lung diseases[J]. Basic and Clinical Medicine, 2023, 43(3): 481-485. [10] PAN T, LEE J W. A crucial role of neutrophil extracellular traps in pulmonary infectious diseases[J]. Chin Med J Pulm Crit Care Med, 2024, 2(1): 34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pccm.2023.10.004 [11] WANG Y J, DU C J, ZHANG Y, et al. Composition and function of neutrophil extracellular traps[J]. Biomolecules, 2024, 14(4): 416. DOI: 10.3390/biom14040416. [12] HENDRICKS A L, MORE K R, DEVARAJ A, et al. Bacterial biofilm-derived H-NS protein acts as a defense against Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs)[J]. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 2025, 11(1): 58. DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00691-0. [13] 刘杰, 贺樟平, 吴移谋. 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网在抗感染免疫中的作用[J]. 现代免疫学, 2023, 43(5): 439-443. [14] DEMKOW U. Molecular mechanisms of neutrophil extracellular trap (NETs) degradation[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(5): 4896. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24054896. [15] WILSON A S, RANDALL K L, PETTITT J A, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps and their histones promote Th17 cell differentiation directly via TLR2[J]. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(1): 528. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28172-4. [16] 王芸飞, 李燕. 中性粒细胞胞外诱捕网在脓毒症病理生理及临床应用中的研究进展[J]. 安徽医药, 2024, 28(4): 637-643. [17] 韩美林, 徐忠, 朱秋皎, 等. 儿童咽峡炎链球菌感染致重症肺炎、包裹性脓胸1例并文献复习[J]. 中华全科医学, 2024, 22(2): 349-351, 356. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003400 [18] KING P T, DOUSHA L. Neutrophil extracellular traps and respiratory disease[J]. J Clin Med, 2024, 13(8): 2390. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082390. [19] NG B H, NIK ABEED N N, BAN A Y. Combined intrapleural alteplase and DNase therapy in complicated pleural infection arising from postsurgery oesophageal leak[J]. BMJ Case Rep, 2023, 16(8): e249927. DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-249927. [20] ITO H, OGAWA R. The unknown sequential behavior of neutrophil extracellular traps in parapneumonic effusions[J]. Chest, 2022, 161(4): e250. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.038. [21] CHAN K P, NG S S S, LING K C, et al. Phenotyping empyema by pleural fluid culture results and macroscopic appearance: an 8-year retrospective study[J]. ERJ Open Res, 2023, 9(2): 00534-2022. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00534-2022. [22] ZHANG H, LIU J L, ZHOU Y L, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate m6A modification and regulates sepsis-associated acute lung injury by activating ferroptosis in alveolar epithelial cells[J]. Int J Biol Sci, 2022, 18(8): 3337-3357. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.69141 [23] ASIRI A, HAZELDINE J, MOIEMEN N, et al. IL-8 induces neutrophil extracellular trap formation in severe thermal injury[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2024, 25(13): 7216. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25137216. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
下载: