The application of mini clinical practice assessment based on Gibbs reflective cycle model in the nursing training of ICU disuse syndrome
-
摘要:
目的 构建基于吉布斯反思循环模式的迷你临床演练评估护理培训方案,旨在提升ICU废用综合征患者护理质量。 方法 选取2022年10月—2025年5月绍兴市人民医院ICU护士52名,按照随机数字表法分为2组,A组26名采用传统教学法进行ICU废用综合征护理培训,B组26名采用基于吉布斯反思循环模式的迷你临床演练评估教学法进行ICU废用综合征护理培训,为期4周。培训结束后选取同期ICU废用综合征患者120例,按照随机数字表法进行分组,a组60例由A组护士护理;b组60例由B组护士护理,护理4周。比较AB两组培训前、后自我导向学习评定量表(SRSSDL)评分、理论知识和实操技能掌握情况;比较ab两组护理前、后徒手肌力检查(MMT)量表评分、日常生活活动能力及心理状态[焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分]。 结果 B组培训后SRSSDL评分高于A组(P<0.05),理论知识[(90.12±6.26)分vs.(79.23±8.45)分]和实操技能[(90.45±8.37) 分vs.(80.05±9.24)分]考试分数高于A组(P<0.05)。b组护理后MMT评分[(3.67±0.66)分vs.(3.10±0.51)分]、改良Barthel指数[(65.89±7.11) 分vs.(58.78±6.05)分]高于a组(P<0.05),SAS和SDS评分低于a组(F=20.871、18.973,P<0.001、<0.001)。 结论 基于吉布斯反思循环模式的迷你临床演练评估既能提升ICU护士自我导向学习和专业能力,又能改善ICU废用综合征患者肌力与日常生活能力,缓解焦虑抑郁。 Abstract:Objective To construct a mini-clinical exercise assessment nursing training program based on the Gibbs reflective cycle model, aiming to improve the quality of care for patients with disuse syndrome in the ICU. Methods Fifty-two ICU nurses from Shaoxing People ' s Hospital from October 2022 to May 2025 were selected and divided into two groups according to the random number table method. Group A, 26 nurses, received nursing training for ICU disuse syndrome using the traditional teaching method, while Group B, 26 nurses, received nursing training for ICU disuse syndrome using the mini clinical exercise assessment teaching method based on the Gibbs reflection cycle model. It lasted for four weeks. After the training, 120 patients with ICU disuse syndrome during the same period were selected and grouped according to the random number table method. Sixty cases in Group A were cared for by nurses in Group A. Sixty cases in Group B were cared for by nurses in Group B for 4 weeks. The scores of the Self-Directed Learning Assessment Scale (SRSSDL), the mastery of theoretical knowledge and practical skills of Group A and Group B before and after the training were compared. The scores of the manual muscle strength Test (MMT) scale, activities of daily living, and psychological states [Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores] of Group A and Group B before and after nursing. Results After training, the SRSSDL score of group B was higher than that of group A (P < 0.05), and the examination scores of theoretical knowledge[(90.12±6.26) vs.(79.23±8.45) points] and practical skills [(90.45±8.37) vs.(80.05±9.24) points] were higher than those of Group A (P < 0.05). After nursing, the MMT score [(3.67±0.66) vs.(3.10±0.51) points] and the modified Barthel index [(65.89±7.11) vs.(58.78±6.05) points] in group B were higher than those in group A (P < 0.05), while the SAS and SDS scores were lower than those in group A (F=20.871, 18.973; P < 0.001, < 0.001). Conclusion The mini clinical practice assessment based on the Gibbs reflective cycle model can not only enhance the self-directed learning and professional ability of ICU nurses, but also improve the muscle strength and daily living ability of patients with ICU disuse syndrome, and alleviate their anxiety and depression. -
表 1 2组ICU护士培训前后SRSSDL评分比较(x ±s,分)
Table 1. Comparison of SRSSDL scores before and after training between two groups of ICU nurses (x ±s, points)
组别 人数 学习意识 学习评价 学习行为 培训前 培训后 培训前 培训后 培训前 培训后 A组 26 30.98±4.56 37.09±6.23b 29.87±5.21 35.25±6.31b 32.45±5.26 36.77±6.81b B组 26 31.34±5.77 43.50±7.24b 30.17±6.34 40.88±6.27b 32.59±6.84 41.23±7.20b 统计量 0.250a 19.245c 0.186a 23.454c 0.083a 18.509c P值 0.804 <0.001 0.853 <0.001 0.934 <0.001 组别 人数 学习策略 人际关系技能 总分 培训前 培训后 培训前 培训后 培训前 培训后 A组 26 30.28±5.47 36.53±6.31b 32.99±5.67 38.67±7.82b 156.57±20.34 184.31±15.73b B组 26 30.56±6.31 41.09±5.47b 33.17±6.24 42.35±8.09b 157.83±12.22 209.05±20.76b 统计量 0.171a 18.341c 0.109a 14.561c 0.271a 33.207c P值 0.865 <0.001 0.914 <0.001 0.788 <0.001 注:a为t值,c为F值; 与同组培训前比较,bP<0.05。 表 2 2组护士培训前后理论知识和实操技能考试成绩比较(x ±s,分)
Table 2. Comparison of theoretical knowledge and practical skill examination scores before and after training between two groups of nurses (x ±s, points)
组别 人数 理论知识 实操技能 培训前 培训后 培训前 培训后 A组 26 69.33±5.12 79.23±8.45b 68.88±6.23 80.05±9.24b B组 26 70.09±6.24 90.12±6.26b 68.31±7.51 90.45±8.37b 统计量 0.480a 25.467c 0.298a 23.121c P值 0.633 <0.001 0.767 <0.001 注:a为t值,c为F值; 与同组培训前比较,bP<0.05。 表 3 2组废用综合征患者护理前后肌力和日常生活能力比较(x ±s,分)
Table 3. Comparison of muscle strength and activities of daily living before and after nursing care between two groups of patients with disuse syndrome (x ±s, points)
组别 例数 MMT评分 改良Barthel指数 护理前 护理后 护理前 护理后 a组 60 2.26±0.57 3.10±0.51b 48.98±5.11 58.78±6.05b b组 60 2.39±0.78 3.67±0.66b 49.34±6.03 65.89±7.11b 统计量 1.042a 13.561c 0.353a 16.334c P值 0.299 <0.001 0.725 <0.001 注:a为t值,c为F值; 与同组护理前比较,bP<0.05。 表 4 2组废用综合征患者护理前后心理状态比较(分,x ±s)
Table 4. Comparison of psychological status before and after nursing care between two groups of patients with disuse syndrome (points, x ±s)
组别 例数 SAS评分 SDS评分 护理前 护理后 护理前 护理后 a组 60 56.98±5.61 49.81±6.78b 57.79±6.04 51.87±5.01b b组 60 57.19±6.70 40.12±5.36b 58.08±7.03 45.24±6.09b 统计量 0.186a 20.871c 0.242a 18.973c P值 0.853 <0.001 0.809 <0.001 注:a为t值,c为F值; 与同组护理前比较,bP<0.05。 -
[1] 王宁宁, 帕丽达·买买提, 苗田雨, 等. 废用性膝关节挛缩患者日常活动能力现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理管理杂志, 2023, 23(4): 266-270.WANG N N, PALIDA·MAIMAITI, MIAO T Y, et al. Study on the current status and influencing factors of activities of daily living in patients with disuse knee joint contracture[J]. Journal of Nursing Administration, 2023, 23(4): 266-270. [2] ARDILA SUÁREZ E F, ESCALADA-HERNÁNDEZ P. Proposal of nursing diagnosis "adult disuse syndrome": a conceptual derivation and integrative review[J]. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2024, 35(3): 205-212. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12440 [3] 陈阳广, 李小芒, 赵嘉, 等. 护教协同迷你临床演练评估教学模式在护理学基础课程中的应用(英文)[J]International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2023, 10(3): 359-366.CHEN Y G, LI X M, ZHAO J, et al. Effects of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise teaching mode based on nurse-faculty cooperation in Fundamentals of Nursing course: A quasi-experimental study[J]. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2023, 10(3): 359-366. [4] 丁转弟, 张婷, 贾新. KSR-CDIO结合吉布斯反思循环模式在老年科护理实习带教中的应用效果[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2025, 24(3): 396-401.DING Z D, ZHANG T, JIA X. Application effect of KSR-CDIO combined with Gibbs reflection cycle in geriatric nursing internship teaching[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2025, 24(3): 396-401. [5] 胡晶晶, 赵琦. 吉布斯反思循环教学模式在手外科新护士规范化培训中的效果研究[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2023, 39(6): 537-540.HU J J, ZHAO Q. Research on the effect of Gibbs reflective cycle teaching mode in standardized training of new hand surgery nurses[J]. Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery, 2023, 39(6): 537-540. [6] 沈王琴, 胡雁. 中文版自我导向学习评定量表的信度与效度[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2011, 46(12): 1211-1213.SHEN W Q, HU Y. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Self-Rating Scale of Self-Directed Learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2011, 46(12): 1211-1213. [7] 邢学良, 曲阳, 辛贵乐, 等. 以针康法为主的中医整合康复技术对脑卒中偏瘫肢体肌力、运动功能的干预效果分析[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2024, 42(4): 69-73.XING X L, QU Y, XIN G L, et al. Effect of traditional Chinese medicine integrated rehabilitation techniques with acupuncture and rehabilitation as main method on limb muscle strength and motor function in patients with hemiplegia after stroke[J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2024, 42(4): 69-73. [8] 王赛华, 施加加, 孙莹, 等. 简体版改良Barthel指数在脑卒中恢复期中的信度与效度研究[J]. 中国康复, 2020, 35(4): 179-182.WANG S H, SHI J J, SUN Y, et al. Reliability and validity of the simplified version Modified Barthel Index in convalescence period of stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation, 2020, 35(4): 179-182. [9] 段泉泉, 胜利. 焦虑及抑郁自评量表的临床效度[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2012, 26(9): 676-679.DUAN Q Q, SHENG L. Clinical validity of anxiety and depression self-rating scale[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2012, 26(9): 676-679. [10] 王敬斋, 张树荣. Zung焦虑抑郁自评量表对消化内科门诊患者焦虑抑郁的测评[J]. 临床消化病杂志, 2016, 28(3): 150-153.WANG J Z, ZHANG S R. Assessment of anxiety and depression in gastrointestinal outpatients by Zung self-rating anxiety and depression scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2016, 28(3): 150-153. [11] ZHAN T T, WANG L L, WANG Y, et al. Master of nursing specialist experiences of an internship through the use of written reflections: a qualitative research study[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9(2): e13299. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13299. [12] SOW C F, RASIAH S, ER H M. A critical exploration of theoretical frameworks for reflective learning: reflections from a faculty development workshop[J]. Med Sci Educ, 2025, 35(1): 503-507. [13] 崔莹, 薄红, 曹德品, 等. 迷你临床演练评估在以病例为基础的临床见习教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021, 41(1): 66-69.CUI Y, BO H, CAO D P, et al. Application of Mini-CEX in case-based clinical probation teaching[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education, 2021, 41(1): 66-69. [14] 马杰, 李秀川, 周平辉, 等. 基于岗位胜任力的OSCE教学在护理实习带教中的效果评价[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(12): 2131-2133, 2150. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002786MA J, LI X C, ZHOU P H, et al. Effect evaluation of OSCE teaching based on post competence in nursing practice teaching[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(12): 2131-2133. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002786 [15] 张晓晓. 基于吉布斯反思循环的复盘教学法在呼吸与危重症医学科低年资护士培养中的应用[J]. 产业与科技论坛, 2025, 24(15): 189-191.ZHANG X X. Application of debriefing teaching method based on Gibbs reflective cycle in training of junior nurses in department of respiratory and critical care medicine[J]. Industrial & Science Tribune, 2025, 24(15): 189-191. [16] 王鹏, 江晓华, 耿浩非, 等. 迷你临床演练评估在肿瘤专科医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 重庆医学, 2021, 50(12): 2149-2152.WANG P, JIANG X H, GENG H F, et al. Application of mini-clinical evaluation exercise in specialists standardized training of oncology department[J]. Chongqing Medicine, 2021, 50(12): 2149-2152. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 0
- 被引次数: 0
下载: