留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

多镜联合治疗复杂性肾结石的疗效分析及安全性评价

陆邦东,  娄彦亭,  张宇,  王飞飞,  周梦娇,  顾瑢

陆邦东, 娄彦亭, 张宇, 王飞飞, 周梦娇, 顾瑢. 多镜联合治疗复杂性肾结石的疗效分析及安全性评价[J]. 中华全科医学, 2026, 24(6): 944-947. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004527
引用本文: 陆邦东, 娄彦亭, 张宇, 王飞飞, 周梦娇, 顾瑢. 多镜联合治疗复杂性肾结石的疗效分析及安全性评价[J]. 中华全科医学, 2026, 24(6): 944-947. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004527
LU Bangdong, LOU Yanting, ZHANG Yu, WANG Feifei, ZHOU Mengjiao, GU Rong. Efficacy analysis and safety evaluation of multi-endoscopy combination intrarenal surgery for complex renal calculi[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2026, 24(6): 944-947. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004527
Citation: LU Bangdong, LOU Yanting, ZHANG Yu, WANG Feifei, ZHOU Mengjiao, GU Rong. Efficacy analysis and safety evaluation of multi-endoscopy combination intrarenal surgery for complex renal calculi[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2026, 24(6): 944-947. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004527

多镜联合治疗复杂性肾结石的疗效分析及安全性评价

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.004527
基金项目: 

安徽省教育厅高校科学研究项目 KJ2021A0335

详细信息
    通讯作者:

    娄彦亭,E-mail:louyanting@ahmu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: R692.4

Efficacy analysis and safety evaluation of multi-endoscopy combination intrarenal surgery for complex renal calculi

  • 摘要:   目的  探讨经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的结石清除率及术后并发症等指标,评估其临床应用价值。  方法  回顾性分析2022年1月—2024年9月安徽医科大学第四附属医院收治的53例复杂性肾结石患者的临床资料,根据治疗方法分为PCNL组(对照组,27例)和多镜联合组(观察组,26例)。比较2组患者手术和住院时间、住院费用、一期结石清除率、通道个数、肾功能指标、出血感染指标、疼痛评分以及并发症发生情况等。  结果  观察组手术时间、住院时间、住院费用均低于对照组[(128.54±20.73)min vs.(160.81±28.24)min;(9.04± 2.52)d vs.(11.04±2.88)d;(1.78±0.19)万元vs.(2.02±0.31)万元],且一期结石清除率更高[84.62%(22/26)vs. 55.56%(15/27)],建立通道个数更少[(1.27±0.45)个vs.(2.37± 0.69)个],差异均有统计学意义P<0.05)。2组术前肌酐(Cr)、尿素氮(BUN)和β2-微球蛋白(β2-MG)差异均无统计学意义,术后差异均有统计学意义;观察组患者手术前后Hb、hs-CRP及PCT差值水平低于对照组(P<0.05);术后6 h,观察组患者VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05);2组患者术后12 h及24 h VAS评分差异无统计学意义。观察组术后并发症总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。  结论  经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石能提高一期结石清除率,减少术后并发症,安全有效。

     

  • 表  1  2组复杂性肾结石患者基线资料比较

    Table  1.   Comparison of baseline characteristics in patients with complex kidney stones

    组别 例数 性别(例) 年龄(x±s,岁) 侧别(例) 结石体积(x±s,cm3) 结石类型(例)
    男性 女性 左侧 右侧 鹿角形结石 多发性结石
    观察组 26 14 12 54.12±10.07 11 15 4.31±0.73 9 17
    对照组 27 15 12 53.00±13.24 15 12 4.54±0.55 8 19
    统计量 0.016a 0.379b 0.925a 1.596b 0.151a
    P值 0.899 0.705 0.336 0.115 0.698
    注:a为χ2值,b为t值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  2组复杂性肾结石患者住院及手术相关资料比较

    Table  2.   Comparison of hospitalization and surgical-related data between the two groups of patients with complex kidney stones

    组别 例数 手术时间(x±s,min) 住院时间(x±s,d) 住院费用(x±s,万元) 一次性结石清除[例(%)] 通道个数(x±s,个)
    观察组 26 128.54±20.73 9.04±2.52 1.78±0.19 22(84.62) 1.27±0.45
    对照组 27 160.81±28.24 11.04±2.88 2.02±0.31 15(55.56) 2.37±0.69
    统计量 4.728a 2.686a 3.567a 4.018b 6.911a
    P值 <0.001 0.010 <0.001 0.035 <0.001
    注:a为t值,b为χ2值。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  2组复杂性肾结石患者手术前后肾功能指标比较[M(P25,P75)]

    Table  3.   Comparison of renal function parameters before and after surgery between the two groups of patients with complex kidney stones [M(P25, P75)].

    组别 例数 Cr(μmol/L)
    术前 术后 手术前后差值
    观察组 26 78.50(68.75, 93.25) 85.50(75.75, 103.00)a 7.50(4.00, 10.75)
    对照组 27 73.00(63.00, 104.00) 114.00(89.00, 144.00)a 23.00(18.00, 30.00)
    Z值 0.154 3.484 6.405
    P值 0.877 <0.001 <0.001
    组别 例数 BUN(mmol/L)
    术前 术后 手术前后差值
    多镜联合组 26 6.40(5.30, 7.55) 6.90(6.00, 8.13)a 0.40(0.30, 0.50)
    PCNL组 27 6.30(5.70, 7.70) 8.30(7.40, 10.10)a 1.60(1.40, 2.60)
    Z值 0.627 4.391 7.032
    P值 0.530 <0.001 <0.001
    组别 例数 β2-MG(mg/L)
    术前 术后 手术前后差值
    观察组 26 2.77(2.39, 3.42) 2.81(2.47, 3.48)a 0.06(0.04, 0.07)
    对照组 27 2.98(2.49, 3.52) 3.54(2.93, 3.89)a 0.47(0.30, 0.64)
    Z值 0.668 3.350 7.216
    P值 0.504 <0.001 <0.001
    注:与同组术前比较,aP<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  2组复杂性肾结石患者手术前后Hb、hs-CRP、PCT比较(x±s)

    Table  4.   Comparison of Hb, hs-CRP, and PCT levels before and after surgery between the two groups of patients with complex kidney stones (x±s)

    组别 例数 Hb(g/L) Hb下降值
    术前 术后
    观察组 26 145.64±2.92 132.79±5.47b 12.85±4.08
    对照组 27 144.52±2.55 128.37±5.54b 16.15±5.03
    统计量 1.753a 7.776c 3.139a
    P值 0.083 0.007 0.003
    组别 例数 hs-CRP(mg/L) 手术前后差值
    术前 术后
    观察组 26 1.49±0.78 1.81±0.80b 0.32±0.10
    对照组 27 1.37±0.82 1.81±0.84b 0.45±0.13
    统计量 0.673a 19.937c 4.828a
    P值 0.503 <0.001 <0.001
    组别 例数 PCT(mg/L) 手术前后差值
    术前 术后
    观察组 26 0.10±0.01 0.25±0.08b 0.15±0.08
    对照组 27 0.11±0.01 0.30±0.06b 0.19±0.05
    统计量 1.671a 7.140c 2.730a
    P值 0.099 0.009 0.010
    注:a为t值,c为F值;与同组术前比较,bP<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  2组复杂性肾结石患者术后6、12、24 h VAS评分比较[M(P25, P75), 分]

    Table  5.   Comparison of postoperative VAS (6, 12, 24h) between the two groups of patients with complex kidney stones [M(P25, P75), points]

    组别 例数 6 h 12 h 24 h
    观察组 26 2.00(1.00, 2.00) 1.00(0.00, 1.00)a 0.00(0.00, 0.00)ab
    对照组 27 2.00(2.00, 3.00) 1.00(1.00, 1.00)a 0.00(0.00, 0.00)ab
    Z值 3.314 1.576 1.153
    P值 <0.001 0.115 0.249
    注:与同组术后6 h比较,aP<0.05;与同组术后12 h比较,bP<0.05。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  2组复杂性肾结石患者VAS评分比较的广义估计方程分析

    Table  6.   Generalized estimating equation analysis of VAS score comparison between two groups of patients with complex kidney stones

    组别 时间 B SE Waldχ2 P值 OR值 95% CI
    观察组 术后6 h 1.692 0.142 143.000 <0.001 5.432 4.116~7.168
    术后12 h 0.615 0.095 41.600 <0.001 1.850 1.535~2.231
    对照组 术后6 h 2.222 0.109 415.385 <0.001 9.228 7.452~11.426
    术后12 h 0.778 0.080 94.500 <0.001 2.177 1.861~2.546
    组间 术后6 h -0.530 0.179 8.798 0.003 0.589 0.415~0.835
    术后12 h -0.162 0.125 1.701 0.192 0.850 0.666~1.085
    注:均以术后24 h为参照。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  2组复杂性肾结石患者术后并发症发生率比较

    Table  7.   Comparison of postoperative complication rates between the two groups of patients with complex kidney stones

    组别 例数 发热(例) 肾脏出血(例) 尿瘘(例) 总发生[例(%)]
    观察组 26 1 1 0 2(7.69)
    对照组 27 4 5 0 9(33.33)
    χ2值 0.802 1.567 5.295
    P值 0.370 0.211 0.021
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ZHANG J, GU X N. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with B-mode ultrasound-guided renal access in the lateral decubitus flank position for complex renal calculi[J]. Arch Esp Urol, 2023, 76(1): 84-89. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237601.8
    [2] 赵国斌, 刘鑫, 唐玉红, 等. 3D打印技术在复杂肾结石患者经皮肾镜取石术中的应用[J]. 中国综合临床, 2020, 36(2): 135-138.

    Zhao G B, Liu X, Tang Y H, et al. Application of 3D printing technology in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients with complex renal calculi[J]. Clinical Medicine of China, 2020, 36(2): 135-138.
    [3] 罗杰. 斜仰截石位微通道双镜联合与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的对比研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北医科大学, 2023.

    Luo J. A comparative study of microchannel dual-endoscope combination in oblique supine lithotomy position versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal calculi[D]. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Medical University, 2023.
    [4] 柳小龙, 孟祥龙, 王玉杰. 经尿道逆行输尿管软镜联合微通道经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的临床观察[J]. 新疆医学, 2025, 55(7): 837-840, 845.

    Liu X L, Meng X L, Wang Y J. Clinical observation of transurethral retrograde flexible ureteroscopy combined with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of complex renal calculi[J]. Xinjiang Medical Journal, 2025, 55(7): 837-840, 845.
    [5] 吴宇, 冯飞鸣, 徐卫强, 等. 术前免留置双J管在输尿管软镜治疗肾输尿管上段结石中的临床应用研究[J]. 中华全科医学, 2025, 23(3): 388-391. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003910

    Wu Y, Feng F M, Xu W Q, et al. Clinical application of preoperative non-indwelling double-j stent in flexible ureteroscopy for upper urinary tract stones[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(3): 388-391. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003910
    [6] 朱进, 刘康, 周毅彬, 等. 末端可弯负压吸引鞘联合输尿管软镜碎石术治疗肾结石的疗效观察[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2024, 13(5): 308-312.

    Zhu J, Liu K, Zhou Y B, et al. Efficacy of a tip-bendable suction sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopy for lithotripsy in the treatment of renalcalculi[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Urology, 2024, 13(5): 308-312.
    [7] DING Q, ZHU H L, FAN Z J, et al. Comparative analysis of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy alone for treating complex kidney stones: a retrospective study of 205 patients[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2023, 29: e941012. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.941012.
    [8] GUO Y S, YANG L J, XU X, et al. Clinical comparative study of standard channel percutaneous nephroscope combined with flexible ureteroscope and traditional standard channel combined with microchannel percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of multiple renal calculi without hydronephrosis[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2022, 38(7): 1844-1851.
    [9] ABOUELGREED T A, ABDELAAL M A, AMIN M M, et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the prone split-leg position versus Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position for the management of partial staghorn calculi[J]. BMC Urol, 2022, 22(1): 163. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01115-3.
    [10] 张东兴, 韩威, 王翔宇, 等. 经尿道输尿管软镜联合单通道经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的有效性及安全性分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 380-385.

    Zhang D X, Han W, Wang X Y, et al. Efficacy and safety analysis of transurethral flexible ureteroscopy combined with single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal calculi[J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2023, 50(6): 380-385.
    [11] 王培龙, 李笑然, 何藄琪, 等. 单通道经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的效果比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(2): 101-104, 112.

    Wang P L, Li X R, He Q Q, et al. Comparison of the efficacy between single-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopy and flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for complex renal calculi[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(2): 101-104, 112.
    [12] 赵振华, 徐勋, 冯权尧, 等. 经皮肾镜取石术术后疼痛危险因素分析及临床处理[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2021, 36(5): 366-370.

    Zhao Z H, Xu X, Feng Q Y, et al. Risk factors and clinical management of postoperative pain following percutaneous nephrolithotomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2021, 36(5): 366-370.
    [13] 侯俊昆, 陈姚, 关佳纬等. 超微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜碎石术联合治疗复杂性肾结石效果及对肾脏血流动力学、应激反应的影响[J]. 微创泌尿外科杂志, 2023, 12(5): 298-304.

    Hou J K, Chen Y, Guan J W, et al. Efficacy of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of complex renal calculi and its effects on renal hemodynamics and stressresponse[J]. Journal of Minimally Invasive Urology, 2023, 12(5): 298-304.
    [14] 欧阳宇, 崔凯旋, 张成杰, 等. 经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石的研究进展[J]. 浙江医学, 2025, 47(22): 2461-2464.

    Ou Y Y, Cui K X, Zhang C J, et al. Research progress on percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of complex renal calculi[J]. Zhejiang Medical Journal, 2025, 47(22): 2461-2464.
    [15] 霍仲超, 高一萍, 平玉杰, 等. "骑马射箭"一体位下经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石临床应用的荟萃分析[J]. 临床泌尿外科杂志, 2025, 40(1): 58-63.

    Huo Z C, Gao Y P, Ping Y J, et al. A meta-analysis of the clinical application of percutaneous nephrolithotomy combined with flexible ureteroscopy in the 'horse-riding and archery' position for complex renal calculi[J]. Journal of Clinical Urology, 2025, 40(1): 58-63.
    [16] HAMAMOTO S, OKADA S, INOUE T, et al. Comparison of the safety and efficacy between the prone split-leg and Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia positions during endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: a multi-institutional analysis[J]. Int J Urol, 2021, 28(11): 1129-1135. doi: 10.1111/iju.14655
表(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  3
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-04-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-11-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回