Effect of sacubitril/valsartan on left atrial remodeling in patients with class Ⅳ cardiac function
-
摘要:
目的 观察沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心功能Ⅳ级患者左房超声指标的变化,并探讨其对左房重构的影响。 方法 回顾性分析2020年1月—2021年4月于滁州市第一人民医院住院治疗的NYHA Ⅳ级的射血分数降低心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者90例,按药物治疗分为血管紧张素脑啡肽酶抑制剂沙库巴曲缬沙坦(ARNI)组(48例)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ACEI/ARB)组(42例), 比较2组治疗1年后左房重构超声指标变化以及变化幅度。 结果 随访时,ARNI组左房横径(LATD)较ACEI/ARB组缩短更明显[(-6.92±4.09)mm vs.(-3.60±4.48)mm,P < 0.001];ARNI组左房容积(LAV)较ACEI/ARB组缩小更明显[(-11.76±5.73)mL vs.(-8.14±6.21)mL,P=0.005];ARNI组左房容积指数(LAVI)较ACEI/ARB组减小更明显[(-6.38±4.55)mL/m2 vs.(-4.16±3.69)mL/m2,P=0.014)];ARNI组左房球形指数(LASI)较ACEI/ARB组减小更明显(-0.09±0.14 vs. 0.01±0.11,P=0.003)。此外,ARNI组达到左房逆重构(LARR)患者数更高[26(54.2%)vs. 14(33.3%),P=0.047]。 结论 在NYHA Ⅳ级的HFrEF患者中,与ACEI/ARB组相比,应用沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗可更好地减低患者的LATD、LAV、LAVI、LASI,提高LARR率。 Abstract:Objective To investigate the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on the left atrial parameters and remodeling in echocardiography among patients with New York Heart Association(NYHA) class Ⅳ heart failure. Methods A total of 90 heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients with NYHA class Ⅳ hospitalized in the First People's Hospital of Chuzhou were retrospectively analyzed. According to drug treatment, they were divided into two groups: the angiotensin enkephalin inhibitor (ARNI) group (48 cases) and the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin Ⅱ receptor antagonist (ACEI/ARB) group (42 cases), and the changes and amplitude of left atrial remodeling ultrasound indexes in the two groups after 1 year of treatment were compared. Results During follow up, the left atrial transverse diameter (LATD) in ARNI group was significantly shorter than that in ACEI/ARB group [(-6.92±4.09) mm vs. (-3.60±4.48) mm, P < 0.001]; the left atrial volume (LAV) of ARNI group was significantly smaller than that of ACEI/ARB group [(-11.76±5.73) mL vs. (-8.14±6.21) mL, P=0.005]; the left atrial volume index (LAVI) in ARNI group decreased more significantly than that in ACEI/ARB group [(-6.38±4.55) mL/m2 vs. (-4.16±3.69) mL/m2, P=0.014)]; the left atrial globular index (LASI) in ARNI group decreased more significantly than that in ACEI/ARB group (-0.09±0.14 vs. 0.01±0.11, P=0.003). In addition, the number of patients with left atrial reverse remodeling (LARR) in ARNI group was higher [26 (54.2%) vs. 14 (33.3%), P=0.047]. Conclusion Compared with ACEI/ARB group, the treatment of sacubitril/valsartan can better reduce the LATD, LAV, LAVI, LASI, and improve LARR in HFrEF patients with NYHA class Ⅳ. -
Key words:
- Heart failure /
- Sacubitril/valsartan /
- Left atrial remodeling
-
表 1 2组心力衰竭患者基线资料比较
Table 1. Comparison of baseline data between two groups of heart failure patients
项目 ARNI组(n=48例) ACEI/ARB组(n=42例) 统计量 P值 性别[例(%)] 0.589a 0.443 男性 29(60.4) 22(52.3) 女性 19(39.6) 20(47.7) 年龄(x±s,岁) 69.3±7.4 68.2±7.9 0.627b 0.532 BSA(x±s,m2) 1.73±0.14 1.72±0.09 0.450b 0.654 收缩压[M(P25, P75),mmHg] 114(105,144) 118(110,125) -1.218c 0.223 舒张压[M(P25, P75),mmHg] 73(66,79) 76(67,83) -0.854c 0.393 心衰病程(x±s,月) 67.5±18.5 62.6±22.9 1.130b 0.261 心率(x±s,次/min) 83.21±9.63 82.31±9.14 0.452b 0.652 冠心病[例(%)] 28(58.3) 27(64.3) 0.334a 0.563 高血压[例(%)] 23(47.9) 24(57.1) 0.764a 0.382 慢性阻塞性肺病[例(%)] 11(22.9) 8(19.0) 0.201a 0.654 房颤/房扑[例(%)] 12(25.0) 9(21.4) 0.160a 0.689 实验室指标 血钾(x±s,mmol/L) 3.88±0.31 3.79±0.30 1.437b 0.154 肌酐[M(P25, P75),μmol/L] 94(79, 104) 93(76, 106) -0.146c 0.884 BNP[M(P25, P75),pg/mL] 1 450(907, 2 290) 1 235(995, 1 520) -1.023c 0.306 心超指标 LVEDD(x±s,mm) 60.04±3.94 60.55±2.37 -0.726b 0.470 LVEF(x±s,%) 32.46±3.39 31.98±3.24 0.687b 0.494 LAD(x±s,mm) 43.83±2.83 43.29±3.70 0.793b 0.430 LATD(x±s,mm) 60.65±4.90 60.74±3.66 -0.092b 0.927 LASID(x±s,mm) 45.46±2.91 46.45±2.67 -1.680b 0.097 LAV(x±s,mL) 63.77±10.98 64.20±9.17 -0.201b 0.841 LAVI(x±s,mL/m2) 37.11±7.09 37.48±5.98 -0.264b 0.792 LASI(x±s) 1.34±0.11 1.31±0.09 1.283b 0.203 药物使用[例(%)] β受体阻滞剂 46(95.8) 40(95.2) 0.019a 0.891 利尿剂 45(93.8) 41(97.6) 0.790a 0.374 醛固酮受体拮抗剂 44(91.7) 38(90.5) 0.039a 0.843 地高辛 8(16.7) 6(14.3) 0.097a 0.756 注:a为χ2值,b为t值,c为Z值。1 mmHg=0.133 kPa。 表 2 2组心力衰竭患者随访血压、心率及实验室检查比较
Table 2. Comparison of follow-up blood pressure, heart rate and laboratory examination between the two groups of heart failure patients
组别 例数 收缩压[M(P25, P75),mmHg] 舒张压[M(P25, P75),mmHg] 心率(x±s,次/min) 基线 随访 基线 随访 基线 随访 ARNI组 48 114(105, 144) 102(98, 107)b 73(66, 79) 65(60, 68)b 83.21±9.63 75.81±7.38b ACEI/ARB组 42 118(110, 125) 109(102, 112)b 76(67, 83) 68(63, 72)b 82.31±9.14 79.02±5.49b 统计量 -1.218a -3.234a -0.854a -2.250a 0.452c -2.315c P值 0.223 0.001 0.393 0.024 0.652 0.023 组别 例数 血钾(x±s,mmol/L) 肌酐[M(P25, P75),μmol/L] BNP[M(P25, P75),pg/mL] 基线 随访 基线 随访 基线 随访 ARNI组 48 3.88±0.31 4.32±0.58b 94(79, 104) 106(85, 135)b 1 450(907, 2 290) 800(678, 908)b ACEI/ARB组 42 3.79±0.30 4.01±0.53b 93(76, 106) 98(90, 116)b 1 235(995, 1 520) 945(858, 1 050)b 统计量 1.437c 2.682c -0.146a -1.504a -1.023a -3.378a P值 0.154 0.009 0.884 0.132 0.306 0.001 注:a为Z值,c为t值;与同组基线比较,bP<0.05。 表 3 2组心力衰竭患者随访心超指标及变化值的比较
Table 3. Comparison of follow-up cardiac ultrasound indicators and changes between the two groups of heart failure patients
组别 例数 LVEDD(x±s,mm) LVEF(x±s,%) LAD(x±s,mm) LATD(x±s,mm) 随访 变化值 随访 变化值 随访 变化值 随访 变化值 ARNI组 48 57.81±3.44 -2.23±1.55 39.21±4.24 6.75±3.89 42.26±3.82 -1.57±2.51 53.73±4.59 -6.92±4.09 ACEI/ARB组 42 58.64±2.54 -1.90±1.75 36.57±3.34 4.60±4.01 42.31±3.06 -0.98±1.80 57.14±4.67 -3.60±4.48 统计量 -1.287a -0.933a 3.242a 2.584a -0.069a -1.281a -3.485a -3.683a P值 0.202 0.353 0.002 0.011 0.945 0.203 0.001 <0.001 组别 例数 LASID(x±s,mm) LAV(x±s,mL) LAVI(x±s,mL/m2) LASI(x±s) LARR随访[例(%)] 随访 变化值 随访 变化值 随访 变化值 随访 变化值 ARNI组 48 43.56±3.91 -1.90±3.99 52.01±9.21 -11.76±5.73 30.73±5.88 -6.38±4.55 1.24±0.15 -0.09±0.14 26(54.2) ACEI/ARB组 42 44.01±2.89 -2.45±2.41 56.06±9.37 -8.14±6.21 33.32±5.69 -4.16±3.69 1.30±0.10 0.01±0.11 14(33.3) 统计量 -0.604a 0.779a -2.065a -2.874a -2.113a -2.514a -2.092a -3.018a 3.937b P值 0.547 0.438 0.042 0.005 0.037 0.014 0.039 0.003 0.047 注:变化值为2组随访与基线比较的差值;a为t值,b为χ2值。 -
[1] DOCHERTY K F, VADUGANATHAN M, SOLOMON S D, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan: neprilysin inhibition 5 years after PARADIGM-HF[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2020, 8(10): 800-810. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.06.020 [2] SUN Y, SONG S, ZHANG Y, et al. Effect of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors on left atrial remodeling and prognosis in heart failure[J]. ESC Heart Fail, 2022, 9(1): 667-675. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13691 [3] MANN D L, GIVERTZ M M, VADER J M, et al. Effect of treatment with Sacubitril /Valsartan in patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Cardiol, 2022, 7(1): 17-25. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.4567 [4] 中华医学会心血管病学分会心力衰竭学组, 中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会中华心血管病杂志编辑委员会. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南(2018)[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2018, 46(10): 760-789. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.10.004Heart Failure Group, Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Heart Failure Committee, Editorial Committee of Chinese Journal of Cardiology. Chinese guideline for diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2018[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2018, 46(10): 760-789. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2018.10.004 [5] CASTRICHINI M, MANCA P, NUZZI V, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan induces global cardiac reverse remodeling in long-lasting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: standard and advanced echocardiographic evidences[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(4): 906. doi: 10.3390/jcm9040906 [6] 黎冉, 谢丽娟, 焦长青, 等. 沙库巴曲缬沙坦对不同射血分数心力衰竭患者的疗效及预后[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(1): 10-13. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001716LI R, XIE L J, JIAO C Q, et al. Clinical effect and prognosis of sacubitril-valsartan in treating heart failure patients with dif-ferent ejection fraction[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(1): 10-13. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001716 [7] MELO M, CAIFFA T, GOBBO M, et al. Reverse remodeling in dilated cardiomyo-pathy: insights and future perspectives[J]. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc, 2018, 18: 52-57. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906718300071/pdfft?md5=733e22ca27aec5e42b479764ac28bad3&pid=1-s2.0-S2352906718300071-main.pdf [8] THOMAS L, MARWICK T H, POPESCU B A, et al. Left atrial structure and function, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2019, 73(15): 1961-1977. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.059 [9] OKUTUCU S, FATIHOGLU S G, SABANOGLU C, et al. Effect of angiotensin rece-ptor neprilysin inhibition on P-wave dispersion in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction[J]. Herz, 2021, 46(Suppl1): 69-74. [10] BOUWMEESTER S, MAST T P, KEULARDS D C J, et al. Left atrial reverse remodeling predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy[J]. J Echocardiogr, 2022, 20(2): 115-123. doi: 10.1007/s12574-021-00559-0 [11] GÜZEL T, KIŞ M, ŞENÖZ O. The correlation between the left atrial volume index and atrial fibrillation development in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction and long-term follow-up results[J]. Acta Cardiol, 2022, 4(24): 1-8. [12] RI T, SAITO C, ARASHI H, et al. Increased left atrial volume index is associated with more cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: HIJ-PROPER study findings[J]. Echocardiography, 2022, 39(2): 260-267. doi: 10.1111/echo.15301 [13] KHAN M S, FELKER G M, PIÑA I L, et al. Reverse cardiac remodeling following initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan in patients with heart failure with and without diabetes[J]. JACC Heart Fail, 2021, 9(2): 137-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.09.014 [14] YAZAKI M, NABETA T, INOMATA T, et al. Clinical significance of left atrial geometry in dilated cardiomyopathy patients: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2021, 44(2): 222-229. doi: 10.1002/clc.23529 [15] NAKAMORI S, NGO L H, TUGAL D, et al. Incremental value of left atrial geometric remodeling in predicting late atrial fibrillation rcurr- ence after pulmonary vein isolation: a cardiovascular magnetic reson- ance study[J]. J Am Heart As-soc, 2018, 19: 1-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30371333 [16] LI L Y, LOU Q, LIU G Z, et al. Sacubitril/Valsartan attenuates atrial electrical and structural remodelling in a rabbit model of atrial fibrillation[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2020, 881: 173120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173120. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 297
- HTML全文浏览量: 149
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0