膀胱截石位手术单设计及应用价值研究

朱荣荣; 陈荣珠; 彭程; 王桂红; 王文姬; 蒋琴琴

doi:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002567

膀胱截石位手术单设计及应用价值研究

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002567

中国科学技术大学附属第一医院手术室，安徽合肥 230001

基金项目:

安徽省科学技术厅重点研究与开发计划项目 202004j07020016

详细信息

通讯作者:
陈荣珠, E-mail: rzchen508@139.com

中图分类号: R472.3 R713
计量
- 文章访问数: 276
- HTML全文浏览量: 188
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-02
- 网络出版日期: 2022-09-23

Design of surgical drapes for bladder lithotomy position and its application value

Operating Room, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China

摘要

摘要: 目的设计膀胱截石位手术单, 以满足手术精准配合需求、节约医院成本支出和缩短铺巾时间。方法设计并制作出膀胱截石位手术单，并与传统手术单进行比较。选择2020年5—12月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院妇科需要摆膀胱截石位的手术患者100例为研究对象，以随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各50例，比较2组手术单在铺巾耗时、耗材成本支出、术中敷料移位次数及加铺时间、器械掉落次数。结果对比2组铺巾时间, 对照组铺巾总时间8 683 s, 术中加铺时间423 s, 共耗时9 106 s, 每例铺巾时间169.00(163.00，178.00) s；观察组铺巾总时间5 339 s, 术中无加铺，每例铺巾时间108.50(98.75，115.25) s；观察组所用的铺巾时间短于对照组(P＜0.001)。对比2组的术中加铺及器械掉落，对照组术中加铺11例，观察组术中加铺0例，观察组明显少于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P＜0.001)；对照组术中器械掉落5例，观察组术中器械掉落2例，观察组术中器械掉落次数较对照组少，但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论膀胱截石位手术单一体化设计，整体平整美观，可操作性强，省时省力，成本低，节约医疗成本；专用器袋便于术中器械洁污分区管理，减少器械掉落，避免手术部位感染；Time out设计督促三方核查严格执行，保证患者安全，值得临床推广使用。
- 膀胱截石位 /
- 手术单 /
- 节约成本 /
- 术中优势
Abstract: Objective The surgical drapes for bladder lithotomy position are designed to meet the needs of precise operation support, save cost and reduce draping time. Methods A surgical drape for bladder lithotomy position was designed, created and compared with traditional surgical drapes. A total of 100 cases of patients requiring bladder lithotomy in the Department of Gynaecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from May 2020 to December 2020 were selected as the research objects. Fifty cases were randomly chosen as the control group and another 50 cases as the observation group. The two groups of surgical kits were compared in terms of time spent on the draping, cost of consumables used, number of shifts of the dressing during operation and time of added draping and number of tool drops in the two groups. Results The total laying time of the observation group was 5 339 s (no added draping required), shorter than that of the control group, which was 8 683 s (total of 9 106 s with additional 423 s for the added draping due to intraoperative overlays). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The number of intraoperative overlays in the observation group was 0, significantly less than that in the control group, which was 11, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The number of tool drops in the observation group was only 2, less than 5 in the control group, with no statistical difference (P>0.05). Conclusion The proposed surgical drape design for bladder lithotomy position exhibits an integrated configuration with separate areas for clean and dirty tools during surgical operation. It is flat and beautiful in appearance, easy to operate, hassle free and cost saving. The special bagging design makes it possible to separate clean and dirty areas, thus reducing the chances of tool dropping and avoiding infection on surgery. In addition, the unique "time out" design enhances strict inspections from all three parties involved, which contributes to ensuring patient safety. Therefore, the proposed design is worthy of promotion and application.
- Bladder lithotomy position /
- Surgical drape /
- Cost saving /
- Intraoperative advantage

HTML全文

图 1 膀胱截石位手术单结构示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the structure of the surgical drape in the lithotomy position

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 两处器械袋及使用图

注：A为妇科专用宫颈扩张棒器械袋；B为使用中的宫颈扩张棒器械袋；C为腔镜器械专用袋；D为使用中的腔镜器械专用袋。

Figure 2. Two instrument bags and usage diagrams

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 Time out标志

Figure 3. Time out Sign

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 膀胱截石位手术单整体效果图

Figure 4. The overall effect of the surgical drape in the bladder lithotomy position

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 各布巾成本核算[元/包(次)]

Table 1. Cost accounting of each towel [CNY/bag (times)]

敷料名称	成品成本	折旧费	清洗费	人工费	消毒费	合计
治疗巾	15.00	0.30	0.50			0.80
中包布	40.00	0.80	1.00			1.80
中单	40.00	0.80	1.00			1.80
手术单	65.50	13.10	1.50			14.60
补充敷料	150.00	3.00	4.00	5.46	15.00+0.20+0.50	28.16
传统手术包	285.50	17.50	7.50	10.90	15.00+0.20+0.50	51.60
截石位手术包	303.10	18.90	9.50	10.90	15.00+0.20+0.50	54.70
注：折旧费以清洗50次计算。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 2组患者铺巾时间、术中加铺及器械掉落比较

Table 2. Comparison of drape time, intraoperative extra-laying and instrument drop between 2 groups of patients

组别	例数	铺巾时间[M(P₂₅, P₇₅), s]	术中加铺[敷料移位，例(%)]	器械掉落[例(%)]
观察组	50	108.50(98.75，115.25)	0	2(4.0)
对照组	50	169.00(163.00，178.00)	11(22.0)	5(10.0)
统计量		-8.614^a	12.360^b	0.614^b
P值		< 0.001	< 0.001	0.433
注：^a为Z值，^b为χ²值。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(22)

[1]	张天骄, 吴大保, 张爱君, 等. 腹腔镜和经腹手术治疗妊娠合并卵巢囊肿患者的临床比较[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(9): 1483-1486. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000405 ZHANG T J, WU D B, ZHANG A J, et al. Clinical comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the treatment of pregnant patients with ovarian cysts[J]. Chinese Journal of General Medicine, 2018, 16(9): 1483-1486. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000405
[2]	郭爱军, 鲁明典, 周波. 手助腹腔镜在胃癌根治术中的应用[J]. 中华全科医学, 2021, 19(7): 1099-1102. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001994 GUO A J, LU M D, ZHOU B. The application of hand-assisted laparoscopic D2 radical gastrectomy[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(7): 1099-1102 doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001994
[3]	刘新莲, 常后婵, 别逢桂, 等. 腔镜下分腿式手术洞巾的设计与应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018, 33(4): 40-41. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.04.040 LIU X L, CHANG H C, BIE F G, et al. Designing and application of a tail-slitted surgical drape[J]. Journal of Nursing Science, 2018, 33(4): 40-41. doi: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.04.040
[4]	高江美, 谢珠红, 钟爱英. 改良型截石位应用在接台妇科腔镜手术中的效果评价[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2018, 20(5): 951-952. GAO J M, XIE Z H, ZHONG A Y. Effect evaluation of modified lithotomy position in gynecological laparoscopic surgery[J]. Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal, 2018, 20(5): 951-952.
[5]	李乐之, 路潜. 外科护理学[M]. 6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017: 78-80. LI L Z, LU Q. Surgical Nursing[M]. 6th edition. Beijing: People' s Health Publishing House, 2017: 78-80.
[6]	黄倩, 王宏梗, 张小路, 等. 长纤聚酯布与棉织布手术铺巾术中细菌阻隔性能[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2020, 30(22): 3512-3515. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY202022034.htm HUANG Q, WANG H G, ZHANG X L, et al. Analysis of antibacterial performance of long fiber polyester cloth and cotton cloth during operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology, 2020, 30(22): 3512-3515. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY202022034.htm
[7]	钟弦弦, 金盈盈, 冯冬梅. 你知道吗?一款专业的手术洞巾, 在手术中有多重要[J]. 东方养生, 2021(6): 70-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSDF202106041.htm ZHONG X X, JIN Y Y, FENG D M. Did you know? How important is a professional surgical drape in surgery[J]. Oriental Health, 2021(6): 70-71. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSDF202106041.htm
[8]	刘舟芸. 基于溯源分析的体位改良管理在妇科腹腔镜患者手术体位并发症预防中的应用分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(1): 153-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC202001073.htm LIU Z Y. Application analysis of postural improvement management based on traceability analysis in the prevention of postoperative postural complications of gynecological laparoscopic patients[J]. Chinese Remedies & Clinics, 2020, 20(1): 153-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YWLC202001073.htm
[9]	黄仟英, 骆秀, 李美霞. 供应室超标敷料包对压力蒸汽灭菌效果的影响[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2017, 35(7): 155-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYX201707089.htm HUANG Q Y, LUO X, LI M X. Influence of over-standard dressing packs in the supply room on the effect of pressure steam sterilization[J]. Health Vocational Education, 2017, 35(7): 155-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYX201707089.htm
[10]	于美华, 郑晓丽, 何丽云, 等. 不同温度碘伏皮表消毒效果的研究[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2018, 3(32): 113-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-2479.2018.32.091 YU M H, ZHENG X L, HE L y, et al. The research on different temperatures iodophor onskinsurface disinfection[J]. Journal of Clinic Nursing's Practicality, 2018, 3(32): 113-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-2479.2018.32.091
[11]	魏渝湘, 黄寨, 蒋松云, 等. 新型手术切口单与传统手术切口单的临床应用效果比较[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2017, 10(8): 809-811. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.08.31 WEI Y X, HUANG Z, JIANG S Y, et al. Comparison of clinical application effect of new surgical incision drape and traditional surgical incision drape[J]. Chinese Journal of New Clinical Medicine, 2017, 10(8): 809-811. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3806.2017.08.31
[12]	胡国庆, 陆烨, 李晔. 手术室医院感染预防与控制管理要求[J]. 中国消毒学杂志, 2019, 36(2): 142-146. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXD201902021.htm HU G Q, LU Y, LI Y. Management requirements for hospital infection prevention and control in operating room[J]. Chinese Journal of Disinfection, 2019, 36(2): 142-146. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGXD201902021.htm
[13]	吴耀娟, 雷春芳, 黄婉玲, 等. 护理专案在降低关节镜手术冲洗液对术野手术单及病人皮肤的浸湿率中的应用[J]. 全科护理, 2021, 19(10): 1375-1377. doi: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2021.10.023 WU Y J, LEI C F, HUANG W L, et al. The application of nursing project in reducing the wetting rate of arthroscopic surgical rinsing solution to surgical field and patient's skin[J]. Chinese General Practice Nursing, 2021, 19(10): 1375-1377. doi: 10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2021.10.023
[14]	杨越, 熊林平, 朱燕刚. 单病种患者住院及补偿状况分析: 以陕西省某县为例[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(4): 650-653. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000179 YANG Y, XIONG L P, ZHU Y G. Analysis of hospitalization and medicare payments of monopathy patients: A case study of a county in Shaanxi province[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(4): 650-653. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000179
[15]	夏菲, 薛满全, 张佳, 等. 某大型三级公立医院在DRGs付费形势下医院管理探索[J]. 现代医院管理, 2021, 19(1): 73-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLYY202101021.htm XIA F, XUE M Q, ZHANG J, et al. Exploration of hospital management in a large-scale public hospital of grade three under DRG payment[J]. Modern Hospital Management, 2021, 19(1): 73-75. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GLYY202101021.htm
[16]	李小瑜, 狄雪平. DRGs付费方式下的公立医院成本管理[J]. 财经界, 2021(15): 185-186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJI202115092.htm LI X Y, DI X P. Cost management of public hospitals under DRGs payment method[J]. Money China, 2021(15): 185-186. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CJJI202115092.htm
[17]	李华, 夏于欣, 王西. 手术室非计价耗材基于价格标识的综合管理[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 8-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL201820003.htm LI H, XIA Y X, WANG X. Comprehensive management of non-priced consumables in operating room based on price identification[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2018, 25(20): 8-9. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL201820003.htm
[18]	赵洪莹. DRG医保支付改革下的医院精益管理[J]. 经济研究导刊, 2021(20): 137-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYD202120041.htm ZHAO H Y. Hospital lean management under the reform of DRG medical insurance payment[J]. Economig Rfsearch Cuide, 2021(20): 137-139. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJYD202120041.htm
[19]	LYONS V E, POPEJOY L L. Time-Out and checklists: A survey of rural and urban operating room personnel[J]. J Nurs Care Qual, 2017, 32(1): E3-E10.
[20]	瞿佳, 尹志良, 赵勤, 等. 提高手术切皮前Time-out正确执行率[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2018, 25(5): 89-91, 110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSJG201805034.htm QU J, YIN Z L, ZHAO Q, et al. Improving the correct execution rate of time-out before surgical incision[J]. Chinese Health Quality Management, 2018, 25(5): 89-91, 110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSJG201805034.htm
[21]	戚小霞, 吕树卿. 宫腔镜刨削系统治疗育龄妇女子宫内膜息肉临床观察[J]. 山东医药, 2020, 60(22): 82-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY202022022.htm QI X X, LV S Q. Clinical observation of hysteroscopic planing system in treatment of endometrial polyps in women of childbearing age[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2020, 60(22): 82-84. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDYY202022022.htm
[22]	熊中雨, 易凤琼, 曾彦超. 手术铺巾系统的现状研究进展[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2019, 35(32): 2552-2556. XIONG Z Y, YI F Q, ZENG Y C. Analysis of the current situation of surgical drape system[J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing, 2019, 35(32): 2552-2556.