Volume 16 Issue 10
Aug.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Xue, SUN Juan, XIE Zhang-hao, LI Zhi-jun. Effect of psychological intervention on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of reproductive age[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(10): 1762-1765. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000479
Citation: ZHANG Xue, SUN Juan, XIE Zhang-hao, LI Zhi-jun. Effect of psychological intervention on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of reproductive age[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2018, 16(10): 1762-1765. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000479

Effect of psychological intervention on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of reproductive age

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.000479
  • Received Date: 2017-09-14
    Available Online: 2022-08-06
  • Objective To explore the effect of psychological intervention on the curative efficacy, compliance and psychological status of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Total 64 SLE patients in our hospital between June, 2015 and December, 2016 were divided into psychological intervention group and control group. The control group received medical routine nursing, while the other group received psychological intervention. Before and after the treatment, SLE disease activity score (SLEDAI), Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA) and depression scale (HAMD) scores, and the Pittsburgh sleep quality index scale (PSQI) were compared between the two groups. Results HAMA (12.14±3.68 vs. 9.29±3.43, P<0.001), HAMD (11.32±3.86 vs. 9.70±3.01, P=0.04), the SLEDAI score (10.29±4.60 vs. 9.46±5.56, P<0.001) of psychological intervention group were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant; The treatment adherence was higher, and the SLEDAI and disease recurrence rates were lower than those in the control group. The score of the control group was not statistically significant. After 6 months of treatment, the treatment compliance in the psychological intervention group was higher than that in the control group (χ2=4.947, P=0.025); the SLEDAI (t=-3.410, P=0.039) and disease recurrence rate (χ2=4.433, P=0.032) of the psychological intervention group was lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant. C3, C4 and ESR, CEP were no statistically significant different between the two groups. Conclusion The psychological intervention can relieve the anxiety and depressed mood, improve the treatment compliance of patients, promote the remission and reduce the recurrence, improve the therapeutic effect, prognosis and QOL of patients with SLE.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (208) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return