Volume 19 Issue 2
Feb.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Ya-xuan, XU Li, WEI Dao-xiang. Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of acetylglutamine and paroxetine in treating generalised anxiety disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(2): 277-279. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001787
Citation: XU Ya-xuan, XU Li, WEI Dao-xiang. Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of acetylglutamine and paroxetine in treating generalised anxiety disorder[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(2): 277-279. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001787

Comparative study of the clinical efficacy of acetylglutamine and paroxetine in treating generalised anxiety disorder

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001787
Funds:

 SK2018A0181

  • Received Date: 2020-09-21
    Available Online: 2022-02-19
  •   Objective  To compare and analyse the clinical efficacy of aceglutamide and paroxetine in treating generalised anxiety disorder.  Methods  A total of 30 patients with anxiety disorders admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from March 2019 to November 2019 were collected and divided into study group and control group by random number table method, with 15 patients per group. No statistically significant difference existed between the two groups in general information such as age, gender, course of disease, and other basic information which could be compared and analysed. Patients in the study group were treated with aceglutamide, whereas those in the control group were treated with paroxetine. Changes in the condition of patients in the two groups after 7 and 14 days of treatment were compared using Hamilton Anxiety scale scores.  Results  The anxiety scores of the control group before treatment, 7 days after treatment and 14 days after treatment were 21.33±3.42, 17.40±3.38 and 15.20±2.51 respectively, while those of the study group were 22.47±4.03, 16.53±3.52 and 11.80±2.47 respectively. The anxiety scores of the study group were significantly reduced compared with those of the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of the control group was significantly lower than that of the study group (P=0.039).  Conclusion  Aceglutamide and paroxetine have obvious therapeutic effects in treating generalised anxiety disorder, but the former has better anti-anxiety effect, with faster onset, safety and reliability, which is more worthy of clinical application.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    李兆生. 甜梦胶囊联合帕罗西汀治疗女性更年期广泛性焦虑障碍临床疗效[J]. 中草药, 2017, 48(12): 2498-2501. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCYO201712021.htm
    [2]
    周春闽, 陈建, 陈美蓉. 坦度螺酮、丁螺环酮各自联用奥氮平治疗首发精神分裂症伴焦虑比较[J]. 海峡药学, 2017, 29(1): 100-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HAIX201701044.htm
    [3]
    王哲. 丁螺环酮联合帕罗西汀治疗焦虑症的临床效果研究[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2019, 19(14): 128-132. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201914084.htm
    [4]
    黄海涛, 王龙锦, 熊健. 帕罗西汀在广泛性焦虑症治疗中的效果观察[J]. 当代医学, 2019, 25(3): 86-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDYI201903038.htm
    [5]
    范泽斌, 向彦琪, 陶好娟. 艾司西酞普兰和文拉法辛治疗老年焦虑症的疗效及安全性[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(21): 5288-5295. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.21.047
    [6]
    HILDEBRANDTT M, NUNES N A, ARAŪJO W L, et al. Amino acid catabolism in plants[J]. Mol Plant, 2015, 8(11): 1563-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.09.005
    [7]
    SEN S, ROY S, BANDYOPADHYAY G, et al. γ-Aminobutyric acid is synthesized and released by the endothelium: Potential implications[J]. Circ Res, 2016, 119(5): 621-634. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308645
    [8]
    RAMESH S A, TYERMAN S D, XU B, et al. GABA signalling modulates plant growth by directly regulating the activity of plant-specific anion transporters[J]. Nat Commun, 2015, 6(1): 110-115. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4532832
    [9]
    NIKOLAUS S, WITTSACK H J, BEU M, et al. GABA ergic contyol of nigrostriatal and messolimbic dopamine in the rat Brain[J]. Front Behav Neurosci, 2018, 12: 38. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00038/pdf
    [10]
    李鸿梅, 孙琦. 乙酰谷酰胺联合白蛋白治疗脑栓塞的临床研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2015, 9(24): 109-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWYY201524082.htm
    [11]
    LI D, CHEN Y G, ZHANG C J, et al. Safflower extract and aceglutamide injection promoting recovery of peripheral innervations via vascular endothelial growth factor B signaling in diabetic mice [J]. Chin Med J(Engl), 2017, 130(23): 2829-2835. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29176141
    [12]
    吴雨恒. 关于乙酰谷酰胺注射液的临床应用研究[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2019, 7(21): 23-24. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXJH201921014.htm
    [13]
    马奇, 李丽霞, 连和谈. 艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛治疗老年焦虑症的临床疗效与安全性[J]. 当代临床医刊, 2016, 29(3): 2188-2189. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GQYK201603007.htm
    [14]
    LIN D H, ZHANG X R, YE D Q, et al. The role of the two-pore domain potassium channel TREK-1 in the therapeutic effects of escitalopram in a rat model of poststroke depression[J]. CNS Neurosci Ther, 2015, 21(6): 504-512. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000037485530410_6fcf.html
    [15]
    洪二郎, 常凤坤, 李德生, 等. 劳拉西泮对广泛性焦虑症患者的临床效果及QOL评分的影响[J]. 中国医学创新, 2020, 17(6): 47-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYCX202006013.htm
    [16]
    刘肇瑞, 黄悦勤, 李占江, 等. 认知行为治疗联合药物治疗广泛性焦虑障碍的随机单盲对照试验[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019(4): 241-247. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXWS201904002.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (224) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return