Volume 18 Issue 5
Aug.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Xing, CHEN Chong-chong, HUANG Zheng, ZHONG Liang-jun. The application of cone beam CT in the diagnosis of vertical root fracture with different depth of periodontal pocket[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(5): 730-733. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001341
Citation: CHEN Xing, CHEN Chong-chong, HUANG Zheng, ZHONG Liang-jun. The application of cone beam CT in the diagnosis of vertical root fracture with different depth of periodontal pocket[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2020, 18(5): 730-733. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001341

The application of cone beam CT in the diagnosis of vertical root fracture with different depth of periodontal pocket

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.001341
  • Received Date: 2019-12-21
    Available Online: 2022-08-06
  • Objective To evaluate the role of cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) in clinical diagnosis of vertical root fracture(VRF). Methods A total of 99 suspected VRF teeth were included from 95 patients who visited the Department of Stomatology, Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University from August 2016 to August 2019. Both digital periapical radiographs and CBCT were performed respectively. Two experienced periodontists independently analyzed each tooth and reached a consensus diagnose. The gold standard for the diagnosis of VRF is the crack observed directly in the treatment of teeth. The positive rate, specificity, accuracy and sensitivity of CBCT and X-ray apical radiography were statistically analyzed, and the influence of deep periodontal pocket(probing depth ≥ 5 mm) on the diagnosis result of CBCT was analyzed. Results In the 99 suspected VRF teeth, 84 teeth were eventually diagnosed with VRF. The positive rate, sensitivity and accuracy of CBCT in diagnosing VRF were 75.8%, 89.3% and 90.9% respectively, which were significantly different from digital periapical radiographs(41.4%, 48.8% and 54.5%, respectively, all P<0.001). In the deep periodontal pocket group(probing depth ≥ 5 mm), the positive rate and sensitivity of using CBCT for diagnosis of VRF were 81.7% and 93.5%, which were different from the non-deep periodontal pocket group(probing depth ≤ 4 mm, all P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference in accuracy and specificity. Conclusion CBCT is superior to digital periapical radiographs in the diagnosis of VRF, and the presence or absence of deep periodontal pocket will affect the positive rate and sensitivity. In future, CBCT is firstly recommended in the diagnosis of suspected VRF, especially combining the clinical sign of deep periodontal pocket.

     

  • loading
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (291) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return