Volume 19 Issue 9
Sep.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of General Practice  > 2021  >  19(9): 1484-1487
JIN Xue-ting, ZHA Xiao-liang, QIU Zheng-hong, CHEN Fang, ZHANG Rong-yi, WANG Li-kui. Comfort and safety of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with different anaesthesia methods[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002092
Citation: JIN Xue-ting, ZHA Xiao-liang, QIU Zheng-hong, CHEN Fang, ZHANG Rong-yi, WANG Li-kui. Comfort and safety of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with different anaesthesia methods[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002092
shu

Comfort and safety of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy with different anaesthesia methods

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002092
  • 1.

    Department of Anesthesiology, Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, Chaohu, Anhui 238000, China

Funds:

 1808085MH310

  • Received Date: 2020-09-24
    Available Online: 2022-02-15
    Abstract
  •   Objective  To investigate the effects of different anaesthesia methods on the comfort and safety of patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).   Methods  From February 2017 to May 2020, 60 patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation who planned to undergo PELD in the Department of Pain, Chaohu Hospital, Anhui Medical University, were divided into experimental group (M group) and control group (L) using a random number table method, with 30 cases in each group. In addition to the different anaesthesia methods, the surgical instruments, surgical methods and monitoring indicators used in both groups were the same. The L group was treated with 0.5% lidocaine for local infiltration anaesthesia, whilst the M group received continuous intravenous injection of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil on the basis of the L group. The NRS score, maximum value of MAP and HR of patients with low back pain in four time periods, entrance (T0), intraoperative puncture (T1), foramen expansion (T2) and microscopic operation (T3) were recorded. The rate of change of MAP and HR at T1, T2 and T3 compared with T0 was calculated. The occurrence of respiratory depression, postoperative vomiting and urinary retention during the operation was recorded. The satisfaction survey of patients was carried out after the operation.   Results  Both groups of patients had pain in the lower back and back during the operation. Compared with the L group, the NRS pain score of the M group was significantly lower. Compared with the change rate of MAP and HR (ΔMAP, ΔHR), the difference was statistically significant (all P < 0.05). Comparing the two groups of patients, no statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of intraoperative respiratory depression, postoperative urinary retention and postoperative vomiting (all P>0.05). The satisfaction score of the M group [(8.2±0.9) points] was significantly higher than that [(4.1±1.1) points] of the L group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).   Conclusion  PELD with intravenous-assisted analgesia and sedation can provide patients with better analgesia and sedation, with significantly improved comfort. Moreover, it does not increase the incidence of complications, has high safety and is worthy of clinical promotion.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(16)
  • [1]
    SUNG K H, NITIN A, ANKUR K, et al. A mobile outside-in technique of transforaminal lumbar endoscopy for lumbar disc herniations[J]. J Vis Exp, 2018(138): 57999. http://www.onacademic.com/detail/journal_1000040542207410_40e6.html
    [2]
    BAEK J, YANG S H, KIM C H, et al. Postoperative longitudinal outcomes in patients with residual disc fragments after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J]. Pain Physician, 2018, 21(4): E457-E466. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30045612
    [3]
    KIM M, LEE S, KIM H S, et al. A comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation in the Korean: A meta-analysis[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018: 9073460. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9073460.
    [4]
    邓毅勇, 辛自刚, 许云龙, 等. 椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2016, 22(4): 315-318. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2016.04.017
    [5]
    FAN Y, GU G, FAN G, et al. The effect of preoperative administration of morphine in alleviating intraoperative pain of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy under local anesthesia: A STROBE compliant study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(43): e8427. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008427
    [6]
    LV Z, JIN L, WANG K, et al. Comparison of effects of PELD and fenestration in the treatment of geriatric lumbar lateral recess stenosis[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2019, 14: 2187-2194. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S226295
    [7]
    王星宇, 谢水华, 骆云鹏. 经皮椎间孔镜技术在腰椎病变中的应用和进展[J]. 医学诊断, 2016, 6(2): 47-53. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WMIA201567019.htm
    [8]
    YE X F, WANG S, WU A M, et al. Comparison of the effects of general and local anesthesia in lumbar interlaminar endoscopic surgery[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2020, 9(5): 39. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/341544514_Comparison_of_the_effects_of_general_and_local_anesthesia_in_lumbar_interlaminar_endoscopic_surgery/download
    [9]
    徐勇, 李锋, 熊伟, 等. 术中肌电图监测在全身麻醉下腰椎椎间孔镜手术中的应用[J]. 骨科, 2016, 7(1): 22-26. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HYXZ201601007.htm
    [10]
    STECCO C, PIRRI C, FEDE C, et al. Dermatome and fasciatome[J]. Clinical Anatomy, 2019, 32(7): 896-902. doi: 10.1002/ca.23408
    [11]
    KOZERA K, CISZEK B. Posterior branches of lumbar spinal nerves - part Ⅰ: Anatomy and functional importance[J]. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil, 2016, 18: 1-10. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1198827
    [12]
    FEIGL G C, MATTERSBERGER C, ROSMARIN W, et al. Lumbar CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus of the spinal nerve: Anatomic study and description of a new technique[J]. Schmerz, 2018, 32: 99-104. doi: 10.1007/s00482-018-0283-9
    [13]
    祝斌, 刘晓光. 经皮腰椎内窥镜下手术麻醉方案选择的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2015, 25(12): 1069-1072. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2015.12.03
    [14]
    王冀. 右美托咪定在临床麻醉中的应用效果[J]. 世界临床医学, 2019, 13(4): 129-131. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWCX201503045.htm
    [15]
    黄增柱. 瑞芬太尼与舒芬太尼用于老年患者全身麻醉的效果比较[J]. 中国民康医学, 2019, 31(20): 44-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0369.2019.20.018
    [16]
    LONG J B, BEVIL K, GILES D L. Preemptive analgesia in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2019, 26: 198-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.018
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1694) PDF downloads(29) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Address：No. 287, Changhuai Road, Bengbu, Anhui Province, 233004, P.R.ChinaphoneNo：0552-3066635； 0552-3051890Email：zhqkyx@163.com

    Copyright © Chinese Journal of General Practice皖ICP备2020018345号-2

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return