Volume 19 Issue 11
Nov.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
TAN Tao, CHENG Sa-nuo, DENG Yu. An empirical study on performance evaluation index system of basic public health services in Chongqing[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(11): 1956-1959. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002210
Citation: TAN Tao, CHENG Sa-nuo, DENG Yu. An empirical study on performance evaluation index system of basic public health services in Chongqing[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2021, 19(11): 1956-1959. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002210

An empirical study on performance evaluation index system of basic public health services in Chongqing

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002210
Funds:

 20SKGH034

 ygz2019115

  • Received Date: 2021-04-24
    Available Online: 2022-02-15
  •   Objective  To evaluate national basic public health service projects in 40 districts (counties) of Chongqing in 2017, so making the implementation and management of national public health service projects in Chongqing more standardized, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the performance evaluation index system.  Methods  According to the level of regional economic development, 40 districts (counties) in Chongqing were divided into four regions: main urban area, suburban area, Northeast Chongqing and Southeast Chongqing. The performance evaluation index system of basic public health services (organization management, fund management, project implementation, project effect and family doctor signing service, a total of five level-1 indicators) more suitable for the actual situation of Chongqing was applied to on site evaluate the basic public health service project in 2017 in December 2017. The difference of the performance evaluation results among different regions was analyzed.  Results  Except organizational management and capital management, the other indicators were significant differences in the four different economic regions, which were total score, project execution, project effect and family doctor contract service (all P < 0.05). The scores of all indicators (organizational management 6.23 points, capital management 4.76 points, project execution 69.35 points, project effect 8.99 points and family doctor contract service 2.07 points) in the main urban area were in the forefront of Chongqing. The scores (organizational management 6.07 points, capital management 4.48 points, project execution 60.94 points, project effect 8.42 points and family doctor contract service 2.04 points) of the economic development area in southeast Chongqing were in the last place. The scores on project effect were generally low in each district and county.  Conclusion  According to the evaluation, there is a clear regional gap in basic public health services in Chongqing, and the equalization of basic public health services still needs to be improved. The quality of basic public health services is not high and the effect is not so good. The new index system makes up for the deficiencies of the performance evaluation of basic public health services in Chongqing, simple and quantitative indicators, etc.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘海涛, 李慧敏. 石河子市基本公共卫生服务项目绩效考核现状分析[J]. 兵团医学, 2019(2): 62-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4356.2019.02.031
    [2]
    成撒诺, 何坪, 邓宇等. 重庆市基本公共卫生服务绩效考核指标体系构建研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2018, 21(10): 1161-1166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.10.005
    [3]
    重庆市卫生和计划生育委员会, 重庆市财政局. 关于印发重庆市基本公共卫生服务项目绩效评估指标体系(2016年版)的通知[Z]. 2016.
    [4]
    秦江梅. 国家基本公共卫生服务项目进展[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2017, 33(9): 1289-1297. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201709001.htm
    [5]
    张爱超, 何瑶, 高星, 等. 基本公共卫生服务经费测算指标体系构建研究[J]. 中国数字医学, 2019, 14(8): 45-47, 73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7571.2019.08.014
    [6]
    耿书培, 浦雪, 曹志辉, 等. 国家基本公共卫生服务实施效果及影响因素研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2018, 2, 1(1): 18-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.01.005
    [7]
    柯思思, 张刚, 朱朝阳, 等. 基本公共卫生服务效率及其影响因素[J]. 中国卫生资源, 2021, 24(1): 75-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2021.01.017
    [8]
    南雪梅, 杨金侠, 梁园园, 等. 基本公共卫生服务质量提升策略--基于服务质量差距模型[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2021, 38(2): 44-46, 50. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSJJ202102013.htm
    [9]
    汪志豪, 杨金侠, 陈馨, 等. 国家基本公共卫生服务项目实施效果评价[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2018, 37(10): 63-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WEIJ201810021.htm
    [10]
    黄萍, 汪铭涵, 张安, 等. 上海实施国家基本公共卫生服务项目十年效果评价[J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(12): 1979-1983. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYQY202012001.htm
    [11]
    尕日毛, 李荣. 2015年海南州基本公共卫生服务项目绩效考核分析[J]. 青海医药杂志, 2018, 48(2): 60-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QHYZ201802033.htm
    [12]
    潘伦, 凌斌, 何坪, 等. 重庆市2016年基本公共卫生服务项目绩效评估情况[J], 中国全科医学, 2018, 21(13): 1550-1553. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.13.008
    [13]
    郝爱华, 王晔, 许淼杰, 等. 广东省基本公共卫生服务项目实施现状、问题及对策[J]. 中国公共卫生管理, 2017, 33(6): 750-756. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GGWS201706007.htm
    [14]
    严琼, 童连. 青年流动人口基本公共卫生服务利用及影响因素分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(6): 680-684. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201906007.htm
    [15]
    柯思思, 曹易, 姜明, 等. 武汉市基层医疗卫生机构基本公共卫生服务效率分析[J]. 中国卫生信息管理杂志, 2017, 14(4): 589-593. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSGL201704021.htm
    [16]
    方曼琪, 贝晶利, 甘富全, 等. 中山市各镇区基本公共卫生服务效率评价[J]. 社区医学杂志, 2019, 17(1): 46-48. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SQYX201901014.htm
    [17]
    孟亚苹, 孙灵利, 宋爽, 等. 北京市朝阳区社区基本公共卫生服务项目效率分析[J]. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(33): 126-129, 137. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYCY201733030.htm
    [18]
    孙健, 朱平华, 文秋林, 等. 中国基层医疗卫生资源利用效率评价研究[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2017, 28(13): 249-251. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7103.2017.13.099
    [19]
    罗银波, 贾利高, 刘军安, 等. 湖北省国家基本公共卫生服务项目管理及相关问题分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2019, 35(6): 676-679. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGGW201906006.htm
    [20]
    秦江梅, 张艳春, 张丽芳, 等. 国家基本公共卫生服务经费管理及运行效果分析[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2018(8): 55-58. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSJJ201808018.htm
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (224) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return