Volume 20 Issue 2
Feb.  2022
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Yi-hui, GUO Yan, FENG Hui, XU Hong, HAN Ying. Clinical observation of different hepatotoxic reactions of anti-tuberculosis drugs in the liver[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(2): 240-242. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002322
Citation: LIU Yi-hui, GUO Yan, FENG Hui, XU Hong, HAN Ying. Clinical observation of different hepatotoxic reactions of anti-tuberculosis drugs in the liver[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(2): 240-242. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002322

Clinical observation of different hepatotoxic reactions of anti-tuberculosis drugs in the liver

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002322
Funds:

 2020ZB189

  • Received Date: 2021-03-14
    Available Online: 2022-03-04
  •   Objective  To observe the clinical characteristics of different hepatic toxicity in anti-tuberculosis treatment.  Methods  Retrospective analysis was performed on 90 cases of initially treated pulmonary tuberculosis in Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital. According to the different reactions of anti-tuberculosis drugs, the patients were divided into tolerance group, susceptible group and adaptive group, with 30 cases in each group. Age, gender, underlying diseases, alcohol consumption, duration of medication, type of liver injury and degree of liver injury were observed.  Results  The differences in age, basic liver disease and drug allergy history among the tolerance, susceptible and adaptation groups were statistically significant (F=7.193, χ2=6.398, χ2=8.580, all P < 0.05). No significant difference in gender and drinking history was found among the three groups (χ2=1.148, 2.917, all P>0.05). The incubation period of the adaptive group was significantly longer than that of the susceptible group [(4.39±1.24) weeks vs. (2.33±0.91) weeks], whereas the recovery period of the adaptive group was significantly shorter than that of the susceptible group [(2.28±0.90) weeks vs. (4.67±1.09)weeks, t=-5.666, 7.208, all P < 0.05]. The proportion of liver injury types in the two groups was significantly different(χ2=41.429, P < 0.001), and the proportion of liver injury degree in the two groups was significantly different (U=3.506, P=0.001).  Conclusion  The different reactions of anti-tuberculosis drugs in the liver are related to age, basic liver disease and drug allergy history but not related to gender and alcohol consumption. In the susceptible group, the short latency recovery is slow, whereas in the adaptive group, the long latency recovery is fast. In the susceptible group, hepatocyte injury is more common. In the adaptive group, biochemical abnormalities are more common. Mild and moderate liver injuries are common in both groups.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    中华医学会结核病学分会. 肺结核诊断和治疗指南[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2001, 24(2): 70-74. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHJH200102001.htm
    [2]
    中华医学会结核病学分会. 抗结核药物性肝损伤诊治指南[J]. 中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2019, 42(5): 343-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2019.05.007
    [3]
    中华医学会肝病学分会药物性肝病学组. 药物性肝损伤诊治指南[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2015, 23(11): 810-820. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2015.11.004
    [4]
    林媛, 谭守勇, 彭德虎, 等. 抗结核治疗过程中出现药物性肝损伤对结核病疗效的影响[J]. 广州医药, 2019, 50(5): 15-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8535.2019.05.004
    [5]
    祖大玲, 杨素云, 陈力. 获得性耐药肺结核危险因素分析及干预措施[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2018, 43(8): 1109-1111. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG201808043.htm
    [6]
    SUN Q, ZHANG Q, GU J, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, management, and treatment outcomes of first-line antituberculous drug-induced liver injury: A prospective cohort study[J]. Pharmacoepidemiolo Drug Saf, 2016, 25(8): 908-917. doi: 10.1002/pds.3988
    [7]
    SONG J H, YOON S Y, PARK T Y, et al. The clinical impact of drug-induced hepatotoxicity on anti-tuberculosis therapy: A case control study[J]. Respir Res, 2019, 20(1): 283. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1256-y
    [8]
    何涛, 汪峰, 唐武. 抗结核药致药物性肝损伤危险因素的logistic回归分析[J]. 中国药房, 2016, 27(12): 1626-1628. doi: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2016.12.15
    [9]
    FENG F M, GUO M, CHEN Y, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in metabolic enzymes and susceptibility to anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatic injury[J]. Genet Mol Rcs, 2014, 13(4): 9463-9471. doi: 10.4238/2014.November.11.11
    [10]
    刘芳, 臧珊珊, 刘永梅, 等. 抗结核治疗致肺结核患者药物性肝损伤的危险因素分析[J]. 解放军医药杂志, 2019, 31(9): 56-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-140X.2019.09.013
    [11]
    李文红, 王芳, 付莹, 等. 肺结核药物性肝损害的相关因素分析[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2016, 21(11): 2097-2100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2016.11.047
    [12]
    何红迅. 肺结核患者药物性肝损伤的影响因素分析[J]. 临床医学工程, 2020, 27(7): 979-980. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4659.2020.07.0979
    [13]
    刘国华. 抗结核药物所致药物性肝损害的临床分析[J]. 中国现代医生, 2020, 58(10): 107-109. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZDYS202010030.htm
    [14]
    ZHAO H, WANG Y, ZHANG T, et al. Drug-induced liver injury from anti-tuberculosis treatment: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2020, 26: e920350.
    [15]
    陈诗娴, 周玲, 陈永忠, 等. 住院抗结核治疗患者药物性肝炎发生及转归研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2016, 37(7): 930-934. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2016.07.005
    [16]
    AITHAL G P, WATKINS P B, ANDRADE R J, et al. Case definition and phenotype standardization in drug-induced liver injury[J]. Clin Pharmaeol Ther, 2011, 89(6): 806-815. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.58
    [17]
    徐张巍, 李杨, 许建明. 抗结核药物性肝损伤适应现象的临床研究[J]. 中华肝脏病杂志, 2013, 21(9): 697-700. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2013.09.012
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (282) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return