Volume 23 Issue 1
Jan.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Xiaolei, WU Huihui, ZHANG Qixia, MU Jingjing, WU Xiaoxiao. Effectiveness of an intelligent warning system in bundle therapy for septic shock patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(1): 140-142. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003853
Citation: CHEN Xiaolei, WU Huihui, ZHANG Qixia, MU Jingjing, WU Xiaoxiao. Effectiveness of an intelligent warning system in bundle therapy for septic shock patients[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2025, 23(1): 140-142. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003853

Effectiveness of an intelligent warning system in bundle therapy for septic shock patients

doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.003853
Funds:

 2021KY792

 Y20220577

  • Received Date: 2024-03-19
    Available Online: 2025-02-13
  •   Objective   To explore the effect of an intelligent warning system on the management of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with septic shock and to improve the treatment effect.   Methods   A total of 129 patients with septic shock in the ICU of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January to December 2022 were taken as the control group, and 117 patients from February to December 2023 were taken as the observed group. The control group implemented the comprehensive management of conventional bundle therapy, while the observed group adopted the intelligent warning system of septic shock for disease management.   Results   The completion rate of 1 h and 3 h bundle therapy in the observation group was higher than that of the control group [1 h completion rate: 98/117 (83.8%) vs. 90/129(69.8%); 3 h completion rate: 104/117 (88.9%) vs. 101/129 (78.3%), P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in the completion rate of 6 h treatment (P>0.05). The lactate level in the observation group was lower than that of the control group, while the 6 h lactate clearance rate was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure in the two groups (P>0.05). The central venous oxygen saturation and end-tidal partial carbon dioxide pressure in the observation group were significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The length of ICU stay in the observation group [(11.73±2.67) d] was shorter than that in the control group [(13.04±2.85) d, t=3.722, P < 0.05]. There was no significant difference in 28 d mortality in the two groups (P>0.05). There was a statistically significant improvement in satisfaction scores for medical staff after implementing the early warning system (P < 0.05).   Conclusion   The intelligent warning system improves the completion rate of bundle treatment for septic shock patients, reduces the serum lactate levels, enhances the 6 h lactate clearance rate, and increases the medical staff satisfaction, making it worthy for clinical promotion and application.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    朱沙沙, 兰天, 李战炜. 脓毒性休克院内死亡的风险预测模型构建与验证[J]. 数理医药学杂志, 2023, 36(8): 592-600.

    ZHU S S, LAN T, LI Z W. Construction and validation of Nomogram model for risk prediction of hospital death in septic shock[J]. Journal of Mathematical Medicine, 2023, 36(8): 592-600.
    [2]
    HARBI G A, CHAARI A. Platelets parameters in septic shock: clinical usefulness and prognostic value[J]. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 2020, 31(7): 421-425. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000937
    [3]
    EVANS L, RHODES A, ALHAZZANI W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021[J]. Intensive Care Med, 2021, 47(11): 1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
    [4]
    刘春霞, 张坤, 郝贵珍, 等. 临床决策系统助力提高脓毒症休克集束化治疗依从性[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(9): 1042-1045. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.09.010

    LIU C X, ZHANG K, HAO G Z, et al. Clinical decision support system helps to improve the compliance of bundle therapy for septic shock[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 2021, 42(9): 1042-1045. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.09.010
    [5]
    江河, 黄赣英, 张希萍. 脓毒性休克患者早期集束化治疗的依从性调查及影响因素分析[J]. 健康研究, 2023, 43(3): 286-290.

    JIANG H, HUANG G Y, ZHANG X P. Investigation of compliance and analysis of influencing factors of early cluster therapy in patients with septic shock[J]. Health Research, 2023, 43(3): 286-290.
    [6]
    陶秋艳, 马旭东, 芮曦, 等. ICU护理人力资源配置对脓毒症休克集束化治疗完成率的影响[J]. 中国卫生质量管理, 2021, 28(8): 43-46.

    TAO Q Y, MA X D, RUI X, et al. Effect of ICU nursing manpower allocation on the completion rate of cluster therapy for septic shock[J]. Chinese Health Quality Management, 2021, 28(8): 43-46.
    [7]
    周璜. 医院护理信息化建设在临床及护理管理工作中的应用价值[J]. 江苏科技信息, 2021, 38(3): 63-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7530.2021.03.018

    ZHOU H. Application value of hospital nursing information construction in clinical and nursing management[J]. Jiangsu Science and Technology Information, 2021, 38(3): 63-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7530.2021.03.018
    [8]
    曹钰, 柴艳芬, 邓颖, 等. 中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J]. 感染、炎症、修复, 2019, 20(1): 3-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8521.2019.01.001

    CAO Y, CHAI Y F, DENG Y, et al. Chinese Guidelines for Emergency Treatment of Septic Shock (2018)[J]. Infection, Inflammation, Repair, 2019, 20(1): 3-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8521.2019.01.001
    [9]
    严颜, 魏捷, 吴淼, 等. 脓毒症的微循环监测与管理: 从临床实践出发[J]. 临床急诊杂志, 2024, 25(2): 99-104.

    YAN Y, WEI J, WU M, et al. Microcirculatory monitoring and management of sepsis: starting from clinical practice[J]. Journal of Clinical Emergency, 2024, 25(2): 99-104.
    [10]
    杜欣欣, 于湘友. 2021脓毒症指南: 临床研究回顾与思考[J]. 中国急救医学, 2022, 42(4): 281-284. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2022.04.002

    DU X X, YU X Y. 2021 sepsis guideline: review and reflections on clinical researches[J]. Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2022, 42(4): 281-284. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2022.04.002
    [11]
    孙丹丹. 基于品管圈的集束化护理在ICU脓毒症休克患者中的应用价值[J]. 实用医药杂志, 2020, 37(3): 269-271, 274.

    SUN D D. Value of quality control circle based cluster care in ICU patients with septic shock[J]. Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy, 2020, 37(3): 269-271, 274.
    [12]
    黄飞月, 张克标, 古满平. 急诊快速反应团队对脓毒症休克患者救治效果的研究[J]. 中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志, 2020, 15(10): 1210-1213. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2020.10.020

    HUANG F Y, ZHANG K B, GU M P. The emergency Sepsis Rapid Response Team impact on the treatment of septic shock patients[J]. China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine, 2020, 15(10): 1210-1213. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2020.10.020
    [13]
    吴海燕, 王宝玉, 刘畅, 等. 脓毒症休克患者预后不良的多指标联合预测方法研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(20): 86-90.

    WU H Y, WANG B Y, LIU C, et al. Forecasting methods based on combination of multiple indicators for poor prognosis in patients with septic shock[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(20): 86-90.
    [14]
    储贻苗, 唐伟伟, 方长太, 等. 血钙、毛细血管渗漏指数与脓毒性休克患者早期预后的相关性[J]. 中国临床研究, 2023, 36(10): 1464-1468.

    CHU Y M, TANG W W, FANG C T, et al. Correlation between serum calcium, capillary leakage indexand early prognosis of patients with septic shock[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Research, 2023, 36(10): 1464-1468.
    [15]
    牛凯旋, 吴淑璐, 刘成, 等. 血清淀粉样蛋白A和白细胞介素-6对脓毒症诊断及病情严重程度评估的临床价值[J]. 中华全科医学, 2022, 20(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002629

    NIU K X, WU S L, LIU C, et al. Clinical value of serum amyloid A and interleukin-6 in the diagnosis and severity evaluation of sepsis[J]. Chinese Journal of General Practice, 2022, 20(9): 1484-1487. doi: 10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.002629
    [16]
    周思颖, 顾国嵘, 慕婉晴, 等. 细胞因子、经皮氧分压/吸入氧浓度联合危重评分对脓毒症患者进展为脓毒性休克及预后的预测价值[J]. 中国临床医学, 2023, 30(3): 426-431.

    ZHOU S Y, GU G R, MU W Q, et al. Predictive value of cytokine, TcPO2/FiO2 combined with critical score for septic shock and prognosis in sepsis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023, 30(3): 426-431.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (36) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return